It's official.
We've gone from the Washington Redskins to the Washington Football Team to the Washington Commanders.
We've gone from the Washington Redskins to the Washington Football Team to the Washington Commanders.
I really enjoyed that league. Gamblers, Outlaws, Bandits, Gunslingers, Showboats, Sharks, They played pretty good football.sounds like a USFL team
People get attached to team names. Teams are named after people, animals, things of nature or climate that are strong, fast powerful. No disrespect intended. Opposite is true. Braves, Chiefs, Seminoles will be next. Pirates, Raiders, Vikings, Buccaneers are all criminals. Some people don't like 49ers, or meat Packers. We are becoming a nation of weaklings and idiots.
redskins
Vikings is anti-Scandanavian. Somebody is always going to be offended.
And those damned gold miners. I think the silver miners feel slighted.
Viking is not a derogatory term. Redskin is.
big difference, Sir.
Is Indians a derogatory term? Most people would say no. Yet, they no longer exist under that name. So really NOT that big of a difference to the PC police.
Is Indians a derogatory term? Most people would say no. Yet, they no longer exist under that name. So really NOT that big of a difference to the PC police.
People get attached to team names. Teams are named after people, animals, things of nature or climate that are strong, fast powerful. No disrespect intended. Opposite is true. Braves, Chiefs, Seminoles will be next. Pirates, Raiders, Vikings, Buccaneers are all criminals. Some people don't like 49ers, or meat Packers. We are becoming a nation of weaklings and idiots.
The Sexual Predators must have been taken....
you don't seem to understand the definition of "derogatory". "Whitey, Honky & Paleface"? nothing derogatory in those terms. how in the world is "whitey" a derogatory term without some ASSUMED underlying hatred behind it? its not. its just a word. Honky? same. Paleface? just a descriptor, just a nickname. how do any of those labels put a white person down? they don't. there's nothing DEROGATORY in them.that's like calling you "Honky" or "Paleface" or "Whitey".
"Redskins" is a derogatory term.
what part about this do *some* of you not understand?
they are norwegians-scanadanaviansDo Vikings still exist in the world? Native Americans do and they are not going anywhere. Indians from India as well.
Please remind me where the active Viking group is these days?
most Lutherans are Vikingsthey are norwegians-scanadanavians
if we did, would the mexicans be proud that a group of individuals at the height of their athletic prowess chose to represent themselves by labeling themselves "mexicans", or cry like pussies about it? i reckon that situation would work itself out quickly. at least until the liberals got mad.the biggest issue was the mascot.
second biggest issue is that the group in question (Indians) still exist.
should we have a team called the Mexicans?
that's such an interesting subject... you're posting about the american indians as indigenous peoples, and simultaneously ripping on vikings as not being indigenous to anywhere. do you not see a problem with that train of thought? you're even suggesting they don't exist anymore. and yet, they're everywhere. somehow. lol.Do Vikings still exist in the world? Native Americans do and they are not going anywhere. Indians from India as well.
Please remind me where the active Viking group is these days?
as a free people, we can do what we choose. you CANNOT dictate that. get it?Montreal Canadiens. They are calling themselves what they are.
So the Native Americans can have a team called the Indians because they themselves are "Indians", but you cannot do that, get it?
Montreal Canadiens. They are calling themselves what they are.
So the Native Americans can have a team called the Indians because they themselves are "Indians", but you cannot do that, get it?
The EOG imbeciles. Several of u can join.
If HOMIE1975 were an NHL player, he'd be a big defenseman who likes to mix up in the corners.
Play on.