You're taking a chance here, not sure if Watson goes, if not, this line closes North of 7
I can't argue with you taking 7, with reduced juice no less, considering the line is currently 5.5, and if Watson does play you're in a very good spot
they traded Van Jefferson to Atlanta today. He’s been a big disappointment. Toby Atwell has been good also.rams best wr combo in nfl, too bad their qb moves like cow
How much of that was McVay > Kingsbury? Now that Kliffy is no longer there, maybe things change
watson a can of shit, worst accuracy in nflYou're taking a chance here, not sure if Watson goes, if not, this line closes North of 7
cooper and nakua better.The idiot apparently has never heard of Tyreek Hill and Jaylen Waddle
waddle is good, but is 4th best of the 4The idiot apparently has never heard of Tyreek Hill and Jaylen Waddle
I would not yet trust Cincinnati. 380 yards but it took 79 plays to do it (only 4.8 YPP). Bengals only 2 of 5 in red zone, a cheapie TD on an INT return, and benefitted from plus 2 in turnovers. I think a lot of people just looked at the score and figured the Bengals are "back". I'm not ready to say that.I am looking at Rams and Cincinnati for SURVIVOR, WOULD LOVE TO SAVE THE Bills. Not easy to trust the Rams to win but we should get their best effort. Thoughts ?
Agree. I think Seattle is very live, coming off a bye Week.I would not yet trust Cincinnati. 380 yards but it took 79 plays to do it (only 4.8 YPP). Bengals only 2 of 5 in red zone, a cheapie TD on an INT return, and benefitted from plus 2 in turnovers. I think a lot of people just looked at the score and figured the Bengals are "back". I'm not ready to say that.
I can use buffalo, rams or ravens. like to keep bills in pocket but rams to win could be close and same with Balt across the pond.I would not yet trust Cincinnati. 380 yards but it took 79 plays to do it (only 4.8 YPP). Bengals only 2 of 5 in red zone, a cheapie TD on an INT return, and benefitted from plus 2 in turnovers. I think a lot of people just looked at the score and figured the Bengals are "back". I'm not ready to say that.
I think he has played his last game for the Reds unless he just want to stay and play for peanuts....he has all the money already....but no way they spend any real money on him with all the young talent they will need to payScrew, what's going to happen with Joey Votto? Zero chance the team picks up his option, does he finish his career elsewhere, or do the Reds bring him back at a more team friendly deal, do they even want him back? I would love to see him play his whole career in Cincinnati, but if I'm being honest, there really isn't room for him, it's now time for the kids to play, unless he's willing to accept a highly reduced role of just being a spot player, but realistically is there any team that would sign him to be their every day first baseman, not sure what type of market there will be for an aging first baseman who's skills have been on the decline, he did hit a bunch of HR's when he cam back, so I was glad to see the power, but he hit for a very low average, anyway just wondering what your thoughts are on this
I think even tho he still says he wants to play that he has already punched the Cooperstown ticketIf he leaves, I hope he goes somewhere he has chance to win, even in a part time role, we'll see
For a change they are under pressure from the other two teams in town.....MLS and NFL....Let's be honest, they don't spend real money on anyone, next year they'll field a really good young lineup, and since all those kids aren't making much, that allows the team to go out and spend some money on pitching, they're two good starters away from being real contenders, let's see if they're willing to spend to improve the team
Burrow healthy...Bates great player but young secondary really getting good....people always underestimate Lou after he gets 4 or 5 weeks with his playersNot a Bengals fan, I played Under their win total, I think in hindsight they should have sat Burrow to start the season and play him when he's 100%, the guy is too valuable to put him at risk by playing him when he's clearly not right, as Burrow gets healthier I'm sure their play will improve, but I don't follow them to know any inside stuff, I assume they miss Bates on defense
Took 10 with the Browns
If it makes you feel better, you crushed the total
If it makes you feel better, you crushed the total
Come love this scrappy team with me kane....when they beat SF after the bye the futures will have gone to shitNot a Bengals fan, I played Under their win total, I think in hindsight they should have sat Burrow to start the season and play him when he's 100%, the guy is too valuable to put him at risk by playing him when he's clearly not right, as Burrow gets healthier I'm sure their play will improve, but I don't follow them to know any inside stuff, I assume they miss Bates on defense
good call, only downside is the nfl refs kiss burrows ass every weekSorry Screw, I already have an NFL team, as far as my future bet goes, I have them Under 11.5 wins, right now they're 3-3, if Burrow and Co. can go 9-2 the rest of the way, I'll tip my cap to them, but as of now I like my position
he caught 4 balls, if its near him he catches it period, same with coopKupp coming back has made Puca invisible. Not necessarily a good thing.
2 steve largents is better than 1he caught 4 balls, if its near him he catches it period, same with coop
Sunday Night garbage as to be expected.
5-0 nice workI jumped the gun and bet early.
Jets under 43.5
Bills under 46
Titans under 41
Browns +6 (-105)
Browns under 40