Re: will Doc use this When he acuses me of what he does
i would like to debate on ideals and philosophy but both parties right now are pro-war and against-human rights. those seem to be some pretty bad ideals to a lot of us and we have no other choices since even the "democratic congress" knows where their bread is buttered. they talk a good game but with kid gloves on and don't back it up.
why isn't the democratic congress (pelosi/reid et al) talking like this:
From David Swanson’s testimony for the Washington State Senate Hearing:
“… we must impeach because if we do not, we will be rewriting the rules for all future administrations. The greatest concern of those who put impeachment in the Constitution was that an executive could needlessly take the nation into war. We now face a case in which the President and Vice President began a war in secret with misappropriated funds, intentionally misled the Congress and the public about the need for war, launched a war that is patently illegal under the U.N. charter and U.S. law, began the construction of permanent military bases in a foreign nation with no consultation with Congress and continued that construction after Congress forbade it. Through the course of this war, which US intelligence and international studies conclude has made the world far more dangerous and the United States far less popular, and which has put our great grandchildren into financial debt, the Bush Administration has sanctioned illegal spying, kidnapping, extraordinary rendition, detentions without charge, torture, murder, the use of illegal weapons, and the illegal targeting of civilians, hospitals, and journalists. Numerous attempts by Congress to temper these policies have been unconstitutionally reversed by presidential signing statements.”
