carolinakid
Banned
<table bgcolor="#cecece" border="0" height="1" width="100%"><tbody><tr><td> <hr height="1"> </td></tr> </tbody></table>
Originally Posted by wilheim 
First off if you had read my post in response to Cory1111 in Post #188 you would have seen my closing sentence: "Thank you and please try to have some patience in case EasyStreet wants to take a day or more to consider the proposal".
However, I just now ended a conversation with the highest level of management at EasyStreet including the very top person in a 4 way call in which I presented Cory1111's proposal as presented in Post #162 and Post #183. ..
The result of the conversation is that EasyStreet has opted to respond to Cory1111 themselves rather than go through me. I noted this may occur in my linked post #188 above in item #8:
8. I will report EasyStreet's answer verbatim myself or allow them to post a response themselves in this thread or if EasyStreet wishes to open a new thread to respond, I will allow that. Any response by EasyStreet may include counter-proposals to your conditions.
They have opted to post their own response in this thread to Cory1111's proposal. What that will be remains a mystery to me but I am assured it will be a viable response to Cory1111's two posts.
I was informed that the response by EasyStreet unless unforeseen circumstances occur will be posted today in this thread but it may be 2 or 3 hours (or more or even less) until the post will be made as the top people at EasyStreet are drafting their response as we speak, but are not rushing out a post but taking their time to cover all issues.
I recommend anyone who hasn't already read Cory1111's two post proposal and my one post but much longer response take this opportunity to use the links I have provided above and below in order to better understand where this matter for the time being stands.
You should read them in the order they were written by clicking on the red colored linked post numbers that will bring you to the exact post you click on. - Post #162 then Post #183 both by Cory1111 and my response in post #188. That way you wont have to search this long thread to find the posts by Cory1111 and myself.
In the meantime, all we can do is wait for EasyStreet to post their response sometime this afternoon or early evening.
I have officially discharged my promises made in my post and now like everyone else interested in the issue will have wait to see what EasyStreet has to offer when they respond..
I presented the offer in a fair and unbiased manner as promised to Cory1111 in Post #188..
Thank you, wilheim
Wilheim was the ONLY person that was asked by both cory1111 and EzStreet for help in resolving a very tough dispute and he made a decision in this case was quite clear and as far as we are concerned FINAL.
His decision was that cory1111 should not be paid in the casino dispute.
It is our sincere opinion that Wilhelm is a very unbiased moderator that had assisted in numerous disputes over the years, and he deserves more respect & understanding especially now more than ever for his willingness to still try and help cory1111, even though cory1111 actively participated in attacking a very honest man, calling him a liar, a thief, trying to smear an impressive record of service to the people of the RX community and the gaming industry in general.
Cory1111 sat back for selfish reasons while others engaged in the same actions and never once stood up for a man that answered his call for help, just because he (cory1111) didn?t like the reflection in the mirror that Wilhelm shined upon him during this investigation.
We (EzStreet) refuse to engage in any further communication with cory1111 until he publicly apologizes to Wilheim, admitting that he did indeed ask for his help multiple times on this matter. He must post this on THERX, SBR and the other places he posted this garbage about a solid man, he must also publicly release SBR & Justin7 as his chosen mediators on this matter as we never at any time asked for their assistance or ever agreed for them to arbitrate.
Then and only then will we even consider moving forward on this issue, in a manner considered fair to all parties, as was, is and have always been our intentions since day one.
Thanks and good luck to all.
Originally Posted by wilheim First off if you had read my post in response to Cory1111 in Post #188 you would have seen my closing sentence: "Thank you and please try to have some patience in case EasyStreet wants to take a day or more to consider the proposal".
However, I just now ended a conversation with the highest level of management at EasyStreet including the very top person in a 4 way call in which I presented Cory1111's proposal as presented in Post #162 and Post #183. ..
The result of the conversation is that EasyStreet has opted to respond to Cory1111 themselves rather than go through me. I noted this may occur in my linked post #188 above in item #8:
8. I will report EasyStreet's answer verbatim myself or allow them to post a response themselves in this thread or if EasyStreet wishes to open a new thread to respond, I will allow that. Any response by EasyStreet may include counter-proposals to your conditions.
They have opted to post their own response in this thread to Cory1111's proposal. What that will be remains a mystery to me but I am assured it will be a viable response to Cory1111's two posts.
I was informed that the response by EasyStreet unless unforeseen circumstances occur will be posted today in this thread but it may be 2 or 3 hours (or more or even less) until the post will be made as the top people at EasyStreet are drafting their response as we speak, but are not rushing out a post but taking their time to cover all issues.
I recommend anyone who hasn't already read Cory1111's two post proposal and my one post but much longer response take this opportunity to use the links I have provided above and below in order to better understand where this matter for the time being stands.
You should read them in the order they were written by clicking on the red colored linked post numbers that will bring you to the exact post you click on. - Post #162 then Post #183 both by Cory1111 and my response in post #188. That way you wont have to search this long thread to find the posts by Cory1111 and myself.
In the meantime, all we can do is wait for EasyStreet to post their response sometime this afternoon or early evening.
I have officially discharged my promises made in my post and now like everyone else interested in the issue will have wait to see what EasyStreet has to offer when they respond..
I presented the offer in a fair and unbiased manner as promised to Cory1111 in Post #188..
Thank you, wilheim
Wilheim was the ONLY person that was asked by both cory1111 and EzStreet for help in resolving a very tough dispute and he made a decision in this case was quite clear and as far as we are concerned FINAL.
His decision was that cory1111 should not be paid in the casino dispute.
It is our sincere opinion that Wilhelm is a very unbiased moderator that had assisted in numerous disputes over the years, and he deserves more respect & understanding especially now more than ever for his willingness to still try and help cory1111, even though cory1111 actively participated in attacking a very honest man, calling him a liar, a thief, trying to smear an impressive record of service to the people of the RX community and the gaming industry in general.
Cory1111 sat back for selfish reasons while others engaged in the same actions and never once stood up for a man that answered his call for help, just because he (cory1111) didn?t like the reflection in the mirror that Wilhelm shined upon him during this investigation.
We (EzStreet) refuse to engage in any further communication with cory1111 until he publicly apologizes to Wilheim, admitting that he did indeed ask for his help multiple times on this matter. He must post this on THERX, SBR and the other places he posted this garbage about a solid man, he must also publicly release SBR & Justin7 as his chosen mediators on this matter as we never at any time asked for their assistance or ever agreed for them to arbitrate.
Then and only then will we even consider moving forward on this issue, in a manner considered fair to all parties, as was, is and have always been our intentions since day one.
Thanks and good luck to all.
opcorn: