Beck, Bachman, etc -- GUILTY OF SEDITION

Doc Mercer

Doc Mercer

EOG Master
Generally seen as expression with the intent to incite rebellion against the government ...sedition is constitutionally protected unless it falls outside the “clear and present danger” test.

Clear and Present danger test:

In Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969), the Supreme Court held that, to be a crime, incitement must go beyond mere advocacy of illegal actions to tending to cause “imminent lawless action.”

http://www.answers.com/topic/clear-and-present-danger-t...
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Clear-and...
 
brucefan

brucefan

EOG Dedicated
Re: Beck, Bachman, etc -- GUILTY OF SEDITION

<EMBED id=mediumFlashEmbedded name="FOX News" pluginspage=http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer src=http://foxnews1.a.mms.mavenapps.net/mms/rt/1/site/foxnews1-foxnews-pub01-live/current/videolandingpage/fncLargePlayer/client/embedded/embedded.swf width=305 height=275 type=application/x-shockwave-flash flashvars="playerId=videolandingpage&playerTemplateId=fncLargePlayer&categoryTitle=undefined&referralObject=3946009" wmode="false" scriptAccess="always" salign="LT" menu="false" scale="noscale" play="false" quality="high" allowFullScreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" bgcolor="#000000">


http://www.the912project.com/


Be A Part of This Very Special Interest Group

<CENTER><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 border=0><TBODY><TR><TD vAlign=top align=middle></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></CENTER>
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top