Didn't that teaser win by a mile?Fezzik's teaser of the year was a field goal to the left from going down....
Teaser of the year is a first for me, but Fezzik and Bell know the ABS, always be selling.
OK
Thought the teaser of the century was bills sf
So does this show the NE teaser is sharp as the +8.5 won?
a winner non the less.Any Wong teaser is considered sharp.....Teaser of the year? Hardly.
Wea winner non the less.
Is that b/c they lost 30-17.3* CFB BOMB is up!
However when you look at tonight's history Coastal mysteriously became a 2*.
Is that b/c they lost 30-17.
When he released -6.5, Bookmaker was -115. He guessed wrong, from that point on it was all State money closing 4.5. Consequently a 3* Bomb became 2*.
Texas State -17 is the 3*.
This HEIM truly is a donk.
Everyone with a pulse wins.
The hard part is winning large.
Whenever I hear someone question "Does that guy win" it's such a bad question. Complete Dumbos win. (Sorry Cutter).
Texas State -17 is the 3*.
That's a great priceKrackman with a Fezzian 21k to win 3k on the Mighty Ducks.
That's a great price
Wonder where he got it
That's big value
It's now the 1.25 menu at mcdsNFL Sides to date:
6-4 (+0.90)
This includes a double pop on Steeler ML and spread for +5.00.
Almost enough for the 99 cent menu at McDonalds.
10/2/23 Monday (9/27/23 6:29am) 7 pt teaser GB +8.5/Sea +8.5 -140 [20-34/24-3] NFL 3 L -4.2 10/2/23 Monday (10/1/23 2:33pm) 6 pt teaser Chiefs -1.5/NYG +7.5 -120 [23-20/3-24] NFL 2 L -2.4
Fezz violated several teaser rules: 1 playing opp teams in the same game. 2. playing a road fav(KC) only a 69% play vs 73% in order to win. 3. Laying -120 when -123 is break even so very small equity if at all. Two pt conversion and xtra pts not automatic reduce percentages(like wash should go for two but didn't saving the phil leg from losing)
The road fav includes 8 and 8' not just 7'. All calculations should be based on current rules of moving the extra pt back,incentivising going for two more. If you say -120 is highly profitable then what is break even. Again using current rules. Thanks.Actually, no.
1. Note the first teaser was lost before the second one was bet, but even so, the subsequent line move to Seattle as the favorite made the Giants become a teaser candidate. Both teasers are Wong teasers going through the 3 and 7.
2. Road favorites of -7.5 are pretty rare, but over the last 20 years they cover 6 pt teasers at 35-9, 79.5% and last 10 years, 22-4, 84.6%, last 3 years, 12-1, 92.3%. Only if you just look at last year, 2-1 (Commanders beat Cowboys, road -7.5 fav, 26-6, Week 18), do you get less than 79%, but obviously too small a sample to eliminate this class.
3. So decent equity at -120, but beware of Circa that charges -130 (and grades a Push and a L as a L, doesn't apply to teasing -7.5 down by 6))
The road fav includes 8 and 8' not just 7'. All calculations should be based on current rules of moving the extra pt back,incentivising going for two more. If you say -120 is highly profitable then what is break even. Again using current rules. Thanks.