Javy v Ruca (Contest selections ONLY)

Re: Javy v Ruca (Contest selections ONLY)

Obviously would have been beneficial to wait and see what LeBrick and the 76ers do, but I'm done. Thanks for the kind offer anonymous donor, win or lose it was interesting. Any rain outs or cancellations due to pitcher change I'll come make another play.

John, hit me up for info if it wins.
Once the contest is done lil feller. You still have a prayer but not much of one admittedly. I wouldn’t want someone around who owned me so badly either so I’ll respect that :)
:mutley
 
Re: Javy v Ruca (Contest selections ONLY)

thanks for the money ruca, tell your friend you talked into backing your side thanks as well. Poor guy got a rude awakening to how wrong you are all the time :LMAO

off to gallivant now
 
Re: Javy v Ruca (Contest selections ONLY)

Since the Statcast era began in 2015, there have been 14,171 six-game stretches for teams, and the White Sox’s 51.7% hard-hit rate ranks second all-time.

#1 offense in baseball so far this year. #1 rated wRC+ of 155; second best in league is 133. White Sox are going to score a lot of runs this year. They're not the best offense in baseball but they certainly aren't bad. So far they've been light years better than second in all of baseball so yes, it was lucky that they scored zero runs with the bases loaded and no one out.

White Sox have scored 2 runs or fewer 9 times in 12 games since this comment.

Removing that 14 inning game, they're averaging 1.636 runs per game since.
 
Re: Javy v Ruca (Contest selections ONLY)

JAVY HAS WON THE CONTEST!!!!!!

Thanks again to the anonymous donor, glad my fine work in this thread could benefit a fine charity for $1000. Thanks for the contest, Ruca. And thanks to John Kelly for hosting and holding the funds.

GL to all.
 
Re: Javy v Ruca (Contest selections ONLY)

JAVY HAS WON THE CONTEST!!!!!!

Thanks again to the anonymous donor, glad my fine work in this thread could benefit a fine charity for $1000. Thanks for the contest, Ruca. And thanks to John Kelly for hosting and holding the funds.

GL to all.
Who cares?

:doh1


Dave "The MeatMan" Scandaliato
 
Re: Javy v Ruca (Contest selections ONLY)

Stay tuned for an added-money promotion featuring Ruca this spring or summer.
Thanks John look forward to it. I will be traveling for the next month but will be back home and posting with regularity again after Memorial day.

I appreciate all your help with the contest, your babysitting skills were on point. 12io4j2w90
 

John Kelly

Born Gambler
Staff member
Re: Javy v Ruca (Contest selections ONLY)

Thanks John look forward to it. I will be traveling for the next month but will be back home and posting with regularity again after Memorial day.

I appreciate all your help with the contest, your babysitting skills were on point. 12io4j2w90


I appreciate your gambling spirit, 'Ruca.

Now if only the mentally-unhinged would sometimes take a deep breath.

Many problems with anonymous message boards involve mental illness, depression, bipolar disorder, drinking, drugs, etc.

So sad.
 
Re: Javy v Ruca (Contest selections ONLY)

JavyBaez9;5015170[B said:
]Once the contest is done lil feller[/B]. You still have a prayer but not much of one admittedly. I wouldn’t want someone around who owned me so badly either so I’ll respect that :)
Javy said he was leaving after the contest was over :LMAO:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO
 
Re: Javy v Ruca (Contest selections ONLY)

Wrong. I left him alone and still he posted personal information. He has posted personal information of several people. You allow it because you have no integrity. In a week, when this forum doesn't have me, and has billy, it'll have far less sports contributions. I guess that's what you prefer.

And just to be clear, both of my parents are struggling with bouts of cancer. And Billy posted their addresses, names, and said he was going to shit in their pool as well as beat me to death until I bleed out.

EOG and John Kelly CONDONE this.
This was posted 11 days ago :LMAO:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO
 
Re: Javy v Ruca (Contest selections ONLY)

Completely hinged, just wondering why you lied, sad that you're obviously not a man of your word, and nothing you say going forward can ever be taken seriously
 
Re: Javy v Ruca (Contest selections ONLY)

Javy had a good tournament and was the winner for sure....
Without putting the $$$ is it the same? Some might think it goes into the record book like Roger Maris did *
Either way I have him down as the winner until the rematch with different rules.
Javy vs. Ruca ll coming in the fall.
 
Re: Javy v Ruca (Contest selections ONLY)

Play 1: Kentucky/Kansas State ML Parlay -140 = WIN = 1-0 + 1.00 units
Play 2: Texas Tech ML +120 = WIN = 2-0 +2.20 units
Play 3: Kansas ML +160 = WIN = 3-0 +3.80 units
Play 4: Penn State -2.5 -108 = WIN = 4-0 +4.80 units
Play 5: Mets/Cardinals Under 7 -110 = LOSS = 4-1 +3.7 units
Play 6: North Texas ML -160 = WIN = 5-1 +4.7 units
Play 7: Red Sox/Rays Under 3.5 First 5 = WIN = 6-1 +5.7 units
Play 8: Indians/Mariners Under 3.5 First 5 = WIN = 7-1 +6.7 units
Play 9: Giants/Dodgers Under 7.5 -113 = WIN = 8-1 +7.7 units
Play 10: Yankees/Blue Jays Under 5 First 5 -110 = WIN = 9-1 +8.7 units
Play 11: Nationals/Reds Under 4 First 5 -115 = LOSS = 9-2 +7.55 units
Play 12: Indians/Mariners Under 3.5 First 5 -110 = LOSS = 9-3 +6.45 units
Play 13: Michigan ML -255 =
WIN = 10-3 +7.45 units
Play 14: Orioles/Twins Under 5 First 5 Innings -125 = LOSS = 10-4 +6.20 units
Play 15: dodgers giants under 8 -118 = LOSS = 10-5 +5.02 units
Play 16: Orioles/Astros Under 5.5 FIRST 5 +100 = WIN = 11-5 +6.02 units
Play 17: Red Sox/Marlins Under 4 First 5 Innings -120 =
WIN = 12-5 +7.02 units
Play 18: Indians/Angels Under 8 -115 =
LOSS = 12-6 +5.87 units
Play 19: Astros/Orioles Under 4.5 First 5 Innings -120 = WIN = 13-6 +6.87 units
Play 20: Mariners/Giants Under 4.5 First 5 Innings -125 = LOSS = 13-7 +5.62 units
Play 21: Nationals/Mets Under 3.5 First 5 Innings -115 = LOSS = 13-8 +4.47 units
Play 22: Phillies ML -149 = WIN = 14-8 +5.47 units
Play 23: Cubs ML -108 = WIN = 15-8 +6.47 units
Play 24: Mariners ML -111 =
LOSS = 15-9 +5.36 units
Play 25: Yankees ML -235 =
LOSS = 15-10 +3.01 units
Play 26: Oakland A's ML -138 =
LOSS = 15-11 +1.63 units
Play 27: Jimmy Walker ML over Angel Cabrera Round 2 Matchup -230 = WIN = 16-11 +2.63 units
Play 28: Rory McIlroy ML over Adam Scott Round 2 Matchup -180 = WIN = 17-11 +3.63 units
Play 29: Justin Rose ML over Rafael Cabrera Bello Round 2 Matchup -180 = WIN = 18-11 +4.63 units
Play 30: Angels ML -132 = WIN = 19-11 +5.63 units
Play 31: Martin Kaymer ML over Si Woo Kim 3rd round matchup -127 = LOSS = 19-12 +4.36 units
Play 32: White Sox/Tigers Under 4.5 First 5 -115 =
WIN = 20-12 +5.36 units
Play 33: Cubs/Brewers Under 8.5 -114 =
WIN = 21-12 +6.36 units
Play 34: Bubba Watson ML over Marc Leishman 4th round Masters -131 =
WIN = 22-12 +7.36 units
Play 35: Mets/Nationals Under 4.5 First 5 -116 =
LOSS = 22-13 +6.20 units
Play 36: Sux/Rays Under 4 First 5 -120 =
LOSS = 22-14 +5.00 units
Play 37: Orioles/Jays Under 4 First 5 +100 =
WIN = 23-14 +6.00 units
Play 38: Cubs/Pirates Under 5 First 5 innings -110 = LOSS = 23-15 +4.90 units
Play 39: Yankees/Red Sox Under 3.5 First 5 Innings +100 =
LOSS = 23-16 +3.90 units
Play 40: Washington Wizards ML -305 =
WIN = 24-16 +4.90 units
Play 41: A's/Dodgers Under 4.5 First 5 Innings -110 =
WIN = 25-16 +5.90 units
Play 42: Red Sox/Yankees Under 4.5 First 5 Innings -130 = LOSS = 25-17 +4.60 units
Play 43: Cubs/Pirates Under 4.5 First 5 Innings -108 = LOSS =
25-18 +3.52 units
Play 44: White Sox/Twins Under 5 First 5 Innings -120 = WIN =
26-18 +4.52 units
Play 45: Matt Kuchar ML -134 = LOSS = 26-19 + 3.18 units
Play 46: Kings/Knights Under 5.5 -169 = WIN = 27-19 +4 .18 units
Play 47: St Louis Cardinals ML -158 = WIN = 28-19 + 5.18 units
Play 48: Blue Jays/Indians Under 4.5 First 5 -105 = LOSS = 28-20 + 4.13 units
Play 49: Angels ML -151 = WIN = 29-20 + 5.13 units
Play 50: Pirates ML -130 = LOSS = 29-21 +3.83 units
Play 51: Astros/Rangers Under 9 -123 = WIN = 30-21 +4.83 units
Play 52: Rays/Phillies Under 4.5 First 5 Innings -114 = WIN = 31-21 +5.83 units
Play 53: Mets/Brewers Under 4.5 First 5 Innings -115 = LOSS = 31-22 +4.68 units
Play 54: Jets/Wild Under 5.5 -115 = WIN = 32-22 +5.68 units
Play 55: A's/Mariners Under 4.5 First 5 Innings -137 = WIN = 33-22 +6.68 units
Play 56: Giants ML -108 = LOSS = 33-23 +5.6 units
Play 57: Nationals ML -172 = LOSS = 33-24 +3.88 units
Play 58: Yankees ML -178 = WIN = 34-24 +4.88 units
Play 59: Cubs/Braves Under 3.5 First 5 Innings -125 = LOSS = 34-25 +3.63 units
Play 60: Cavaliers Series Prop ML over Pacers -500 = WIN = 35-25 +4.63 units
Play 61: 76ers Series prop ML over Heat -333 = WIN = 36-25 +5.63 units
Play 62: Rays/Phillies Under 4 First 5 innings -125 = LOSS = 36-26 +4.38 units
Play 63: Pirates ML -186 = WIN = 37-26 +5.38 units
Play 64: Pirates/marlins under 4.5 first 5 innings -116 = LOSS = 37-27 + 4.22 units
Play 65: Jets/Wild Under 5.5 -125 = LOSS = 37-28 +2.97 units
Play 66: Blue Jackets/Capitals Under 5.5 -120 = LOSS 37-29 +1.77 units
Play 67: Knights/Kings Under 5 -110 = PUSH = 37-29-1 +1.77 units
Play 68: Thunder ML -178 = WIN = 38-29-1 +2.77 units
Play 69: Cardinals/Reds Under 9 -123 = WIN 39-29-1 +3.77units
Play 70: A's/Mariners Under 4.5 First 5 Innings = WIN = 40-29-1 +4.77 units
Play 71: Pittsburgh Penguins -130 ML = WIN = 41-29-1 +5.77 units
Play 72: Diamondbacks/Dodgers Under 3.5 First 5 Innings -125 = LOSS = 41-30-1 +4.52 units
Play 73: Braves/Phillies Under 4.5 First 5 Innings -125 = WIN = 42-30-1 +5.52 units
Play 74: Pirates/Rockies Under 4.5 First 5 Innings -105 = LOSS = 42-31-1 +4.47 units
Play 75) Predators/Avalanche Under 6 -122 (nitrogen) = LOSS = 42-32-1 +3.25 units
Play 76) Ducks/Sharks Under 5.5 -193 (nitrogen) = LOSS = 42-33-1 +1.32 units
Play 77) Dodgers/Padres Under 7.5 -112 (5dimes) = LOSS = 42-34-1 +0.20 units
Play 78) Astros/Mariners Under 4 First 5 Innings -134 (nitrogen) = WIN = 43-34-1 +1.20 units
Play 79) White Sox/A's Under 4.5 First 5 Innings -110 (nitrogen) = WIN = 44-34-1 +2.20 units
Play 80) James Paxton over 5.5 Strikeouts -160 = WIN = 45-34-1 +3.20 units
Play 81: Rockies/Pirates Under 4.5 First 5 Innings -110 = WIN = 46-34-1 +4.20 units
Play 82: Astros/Mariners Under 4.5 First 5 Innings -110 = WIN = 47-34-1 +5.20 units
Play 83: Red Sox/Angels Under 4.5 First 5 Innings -115 = LOSS = 47-35-1 +4.05 units
Play 84: Indians/Twins Under 4 First 5 Innings -110 = WIN = 48-35-1 +5.05 units
Play 85: Brewers ML -146 = WIN = 49-35-1 +6.05 units
Play 86: Cubs ML -125 = LOSS = 49-36-1 +4.80 units
Play 87: Dodgers ML -187 = WIN = 50-36-1 +5.80 units
Play 88: Portland Trailblazers ML -265 = LOSS = 50-37-1 +3.15 units
Play 89: Cleveland Cavaliers ML Game 2 -420 = WIN = 51-37-1 +4.15 units
Play 90: New York Yankees ML -275 = LOSS = 51-38-1 +1.40 units
Play 91: Royals/Jays Under 5.5 First 5 Innings Game 1 -124 = LOSS = 51-39-1 +0.16 units
Play 92: Yankees/Marlins Under 5 First 5 Innings -115 = LOSS = 51-40-1 -0.99 units
Play 93: Royals/Blue Jays Under 5 First 5 Innings -120 = WIN = 52-40-1 +0.01 units
Play 94: Giannis Antetokounmpo over 43.5 Points, Assists, Rebounds -117 = WIN = 53-40-1 +1.01 units
Play 95: Orioles/Tigers Under 5 First 5 Innings -120 = PUSH = 53-40-2 +1.01 units
Play 96: Capitals/Blue Jackets Under 6 -123 = WIN = 54-40-2 +2.01 units
Play 97: Knights/Kings Under 5.5 -181 = WIN = 55-40-2 +3.01 units
Play 98: Jets/Wild under 5.5 -114 = WIN = 56-40-2 +4.01 units
Play 99: Arizona Diamondbacks -125 = WIN = 57-40-2 + 5.01 units
Play 100: Indians ML -185 = WIN = 58-40-2 +6.01 units

OVERALL FINAL TALLY: 58-40-2 +6.01 units






 
Re: Javy v Ruca (Contest selections ONLY)

+6 units is a pretty good return after a couple of months.... Very good record.... Did you do a breakdown of favorite, dog , home & road etc ?
 
Re: Javy v Ruca (Contest selections ONLY)

Wrong. I left him alone and still he posted personal information. He has posted personal information of several people. You allow it because you have no integrity. In a week, when this forum doesn't have me, and has billy, it'll have far less sports contributions. I guess that's what you prefer.

And just to be clear, both of my parents are struggling with bouts of cancer. And Billy posted their addresses, names, and said he was going to shit in their pool as well as beat me to death until I bleed out.

EOG and John Kelly CONDONE this.
:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO
 
Re: Javy v Ruca (Contest selections ONLY)

Since the Statcast era began in 2015, there have been 14,171 six-game stretches for teams, and the White Sox’s 51.7% hard-hit rate ranks second all-time.

#1 offense in baseball so far this year. #1 rated wRC+ of 155; second best in league is 133. White Sox are going to score a lot of runs this year. They're not the best offense in baseball but they certainly aren't bad. So far they've been light years better than second in all of baseball so yes, it was lucky that they scored zero runs with the bases loaded and no one out.
Please, show me where I said you were an idiot for your post? Do you even read the responses to you?

White Sox are 26th in MLB in runs... you called me an idiot when I said they were a bad offense, said they were elite and would score lots of runs...

Oh well. Wrong again. No worries. I'm sure you're used to it.

G'nite themanej
I said they weren't "bad." They definitely have hit a bad stretch of baseball, but I'll still say they finish middle of the pack in runs scored. I also never said they were "elite" so more nonsense from you.

I also never called you an idiot for your opinion, you are delusional and constantly make things up on this forum that never ever happened and then pretend they did when arguing with someone at a later date. I merely posted a statistic, and you are flying off the handle about it. This is why you can't have rational conversations because you're not a rational person.
 
Re: Javy v Ruca (Contest selections ONLY)

You don't say someone who is going to score "LOTS OF RUNS" is now going to finish middle of the pack. Lots is a relative term, and it means relative to the other 29 teams in the league.

If you can honestly read your own comment and see it as anything but saying they're going to be an above average offensive baseball team, then you are the person who is 100% irrational.

LOTS. Dude, you said lots. That's a relative term, relative to the other 29 teams in the league. They're in the AL, they more at bats from hitters than 15 of the other teams in the league...

Again, if you can honestly say your comments don't clearly state your position that you think they're NO LESS than better than average, then you're a complete irrational human being that can not be taken seriously.

Also just lol at 'hit a bad stretch of baseball.' They were hitting Nicky Delmonico 4th. The team is woefully void of talent offensively, so of course they're a miserable 26th in runs despite playing in the AL.

But again, you said they would score lots of runs, that means top 10 probably, but definitely no worse than top half of the league, and you refuse to back up your claim or admit you were wrong because you're a gutless fat ginger.
 
Re: Javy v Ruca (Contest selections ONLY)

And the truly hilarious thing is, you know you're not dumb enough to believe you weren't calling them an above average offense.

If I said the Bears were going to win lots of football games this year, and then they go 8-8, and I say see, 8 games is a lot you sure as fuck wouldn't be saying good call.

I don't see why you can't just be a man and admit when you're wrong.

You were wrong about Koji Uehara being better than Carl Edwards Jr. It's not arguable. You were wrong about Rizzo/Abreu contract argument. It's not arguable. In 2014 I said the White Sox should tank, you liked the addition of aging veterans. It's not arguable, I was right, you were 100% wrong. Countless examples and not one have you ever came in and said hey man you were right, I was wrong, congrats. You're incapable. Rizzo has been nearly 400% as valuable as Abreu on a per dollar basis and you still haven't admitted you were wrong about that contract argument we had for a year+.

Must be a tough life, you probably have a tumor the size of a golfball in your dome with the constant avoidance of reality with this kinda shit.

Alas, got a real job, gotta get there by 9. Peace bud.
 
Top