Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

tank · Dec 27, 2011

Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

[h=2]A birther Christmas[/h]by Dr. Conspiracy on <abbr class="date time published" title="2011-12-27T18:37:35-0500" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 1px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; border-image: initial; outline-width: 0px; outline-style: initial; outline-color: initial; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; border-bottom-style: dashed; border-bottom-color: rgb(153, 153, 153); cursor: help; ">DECEMBER 27, 2011</abbr> in BIRTHERS, LOUNGE
In keeping with holiday tradition, I offer the following birther version of a popular Christmas song:

On the first day of Christmas the birthers asked of me
A birth certificateOn the second day of Christmas the birthers asked of me
Two senior theses
And another birth certificateOn the third day of Christmas the birthers asked of me
Three college transcripts
Two senior theses
And another birth certificateOn the fourth day of Christmas the birthers asked of me
Four kindergarten records
Three college transcripts
Two senior theses
And another birth certificateOn the fifth day of Christmas the birthers asked of me
? FIVE LONG FORMS ?
Four kindergarten records
Three college transcripts
Two senior theses
And another birth certificateOn the sixth day of Christmas the birthers asked of me
Six passport records
? FIVE LONG FORMS ?
Four kindergarten records
Three college transcripts
Two senior theses
And another birth certificateOn the seventh day of Christmas the birthers asked of me
Seven baptismal certificates
Six passport records
? FIVE LONG FORMS ?
Four kindergarten records
Three college transcripts
Two senior theses
And another birth certificateOn the eighth day of Christmas the birthers asked of me
Eight adoption records
Seven baptismal certificates
Six passport records
? FIVE LONG FORMS ?
Four kindergarten records
Three college transcripts
Two senior theses
And another birth certificateOn the ninth day of Christmas the birthers asked of me
Nine Law client lists
Eight adoption records
Seven baptismal certificates
Six passport records
? FIVE LONG FORMS ?
Four kindergarten records
Three college transcripts
Two senior theses
And another birth certificateOn the tenth day of Christmas the birthers asked of me
Ten medical records
Nine Law client lists
Eight adoption records
Seven baptismal certificates
Six passport records
? FIVE LONG FORMS ?
Four kindergarten records
Three college transcripts
Two senior theses
And another birth certificateOn the eleventh day of Christmas the birthers asked of me
Eleven financial aid records
Ten medical records
Nine Law client lists
Eight adoption records
Seven baptismal certificates
Six passport records
? FIVE LONG FORMS ?
Four kindergarten records
Three college transcripts
Two senior theses
And another birth certificateOn the twelfth day of Christmas the birthers asked of me
Twelve Illinois Bar records
Eleven financial aid records
Ten medical records
Nine Law client lists
Eight adoption records
Seven baptismal certificates
Six passport records
? FIVE LONG FORMS ?
Four kindergarten records
Three college transcripts
Two senior theses
And another birth certificate

The technical problem with my song is that the actual list of records demanded by birthers is considerably longer.

:btj:

Joe Contrarian · Dec 27, 2011

Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

tank said:
Show ONE thing they have been debunked on!

There's nothing to debunk, and no point in wasting anyone's time with a fringe commie group of losers that collectively maybe get a few dozen visitors a month to their kook websites.

These Obots blog in their basements in their underwear, hence the name: "underwear bloggers". :btj:

They don't go on TV. They don't run reputable websites, and spend their entire lives trolling in the shadows on high traffic websites like the roaches they are. Nothing they have ever write stands up to scrutiny. All they do is smear the messengers and whistle blowers who dare to challenge the Kenyan faggot in the White House.

Corsi is a "plagiarizer"...Tim Adams is a "KKK Nazi"...qualified forensic computer experts who systematically pick apart the forged birth certificates are dismissed as "scanner salesmen".

This isn't substance, its bullshit...and a waste of everyone's time.

Buh-bye Foggie and Dr. Conspiracy...nice knowing ya!

:finger007-1

tank · Dec 27, 2011

Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

Joe Contrarian said:
There's nothing to debunk, and no point in wasting anyone's time with a fringe commie group of losers that collectively maybe get a few dozen visitors a month to their kook websites. In English this means you CANNOT DEBUNK one single thing they have used.That is because they use FACTS.A Birfer knowing what a FACT is just does not happen.

These Obots blog in their basements in their underwear, hence the name: "underwear bloggers". :btj: Funny but not one single birfer can refute the FACTS they present.When all you birfers have is LIES, SMEARS and OPINIONS what do you expect?

They don't go on TV. They don't run reputable websites, and troll in the shadows like the roaches they are. Nothing they have ever write stands up to scrutiny. All they do is smear the messengers and whistle blowers who dare to challenge the Kenyan faggot in the White House.
:lolxmasAre they 0-87 in court cases??Do the FACTS they use ever conflict with what the Judges say?HMM what does that tell you?A person with a brain can conclude the obvious but sadly birfers cannot face reality.Yeah, yeah they are wrong because a birfer say's so but the FACTS always seem to back them up.How many FACTS can the birfers use to back up their claims.ZERO just like their court record for wins.Stupid ass.

Corsi is a "plagiarizer"...Tim Adams is a "KKK Nazi"...qualified forensic computer experts who systematically pick apart the forged birth certificates are dismissed as "scanner salesmen".
Yes this has already been proven and....?Are you really trying to tell me Adams is an expert?:houra

This isn't substance, its bullshit...and a waste of everyone's time.
Just admit you cannot debunk anything they say and quit being a dumbass wasting our time with your stupid shit.USE FACTS!!WND OPINIONS only make you look STUPID.Oh and money too!!
Buh-bye Foggie and Dr. Conspiracy...nice knowing ya!
You wish they would go away and quit exposing your lies but they are NOT!!It is so easy it is not even funny anymore.You have been put on notice and will get called out on your LYING bullshit everytime so get your whining and crying towel ready.
:finger007-1

When you say they have been debunked you have to prove it.You have failed to do that, so PROVE IT!!Taking the word of a birfer is like giving a burglar the keys to your house.Not smart at all.

tank · Dec 27, 2011

Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

Joe Contrarian said:
There's nothing to debunk, and no point in wasting anyone's time with a fringe commie group of losers that collectively maybe get a few dozen visitors a month to their kook websites.

These Obots blog in their basements in their underwear, hence the name: "underwear bloggers". :btj:

They don't go on TV. They don't run reputable websites, and spend their entire lives trolling in the shadows on high traffic websites like the roaches they are. Nothing they have ever write stands up to scrutiny. All they do is smear the messengers and whistle blowers who dare to challenge the Kenyan faggot in the White House.

Corsi is a "plagiarizer"...Tim Adams is a "KKK Nazi"...qualified forensic computer experts who systematically pick apart the forged birth certificates are dismissed as "scanner salesmen".

This isn't substance, its bullshit...and a waste of everyone's time.

Buh-bye Foggie and Dr. Conspiracy...nice knowing ya!

:finger007-1

0-87 in court cases and the underwear bloggers who use the same FACTS are LYING according to a birfer.:lol You would not know a FACT if it was rammed up your ass dummy.
Keep drinking the Kool Aid and sending money and you got him now!!:houraWhen Sheriff Joe comes out with his report [ he got 300 pages from WND] it will be the same old idiotic birfer talking points that get laughed out of court.But according to Joe...;

Originally Posted by Joe Contrarian

Proving injury has nothing to do with proving "facts :LMAO

Joe Contrarian · Dec 27, 2011

Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

you try way too hard :lolxmas

tank · Dec 27, 2011

Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

Joe Contrarian said:
you try way too hard :lolxmas

It is one of my favorite hobbies.You just make it too easy.36 pages later and 87 loses in court cases and you still are dumb enough to think the guys that beg for donations are going to PROVE something.:lock:Keep drinking the Kool aid and sending them money .Like you said...

Originally Posted by Joe Contrarian

Proving injury has nothing to do with proving "facts

Spoken like a true birfer!!:LMAO
BTW can't you frauds come up with some new shit??It is getting old exposing all the same old LIES all the time.

tank · Dec 27, 2011

Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

Good God look at these scammers.On their front page they are trying to sell 2 different things!!
What else do you birfers try to sell besides lies and insurance and pills?
[TABLE="width: 100%"]
<tbody>

[TD="width: 25, bgcolor: #FFFFFF, align: center"]

[/TD]
[TD="bgcolor: #FFFFFF, colspan: 2, align: left"]

[TABLE]
<tbody>

[TD="class: topStory"][FONT=arial, verdana, helvetica]

[/FONT]

[/TD]

</tbody>[/TABLE][TABLE]
<tbody>

</tbody>[/TABLE][TABLE]
<tbody>

[FONT=arial, verdana, helvetica]SPECIAL OFFERS[/FONT]
$250K term life coverage for less than $13/month
Rare natural nutrient flushes plaque from arteries, normalizing BP
--Health Center for Better Living

:houra

</tbody>[/TABLE]

:houra[/TD]

</tbody>[/TABLE]

tank · Dec 27, 2011

Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

1 simple solution to high blood pressure!
<a href="http://www.e-medalert.com/testimonials.php?id=1001-wndmain-1002&aff=wndv" http:="" www.e-medalert.com="" testimonials.php?id="1001-wndmain-1002&aff=wndv"," 'outbound="" links',="" "363977");return="" false;"="" target="_blank" style="color: rgb(126, 118, 98); ">Rare natural nutrient flushes plaque from arteries, normalizing BP
--Health Center for Better Living

:houra
PAGE 2 NEWS HIGHLIGHTSWill Americans fight in Australian military?

Hate mom? You're twice as likely to grow up fat

<a href="http://worldnetdaily.com/pg2" style="color: rgb(126, 118, 98); ">Click here for these stories, much more

:houra:houra

tank · Dec 27, 2011

Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

And of course they shill for Goldline too!!:btj:
But hey I loved the article on how China is going to steal our water!!:houra
What a bunch of tards!!

tank · Dec 27, 2011

Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

tank said:
:LMAO:LMAO
WND: Time to support Arpaio's posse
Farah wrote:
Barack Obama's constitutional qualifications for the presidency have never been investigated by any law-enforcement agency.

Until now.

But that investigation by Sheriff Joe Arpaio's "Cold Case Posse" could easily be derailed for lack of financial support coupled with attacks being launched against his office by Obama's Justice Department.

That's why it is imperative for every American who questions the very legality of Obama's reign and his efforts at re-election to support Arpaio's probe in a tangible way ? no matter how small.

[...]

That's why I urge you to make a donation to this active investigation right now ? no matter the amount. If everyone who reads this appeal gave the minimum amount of $5, it would raise millions, far more than the necessary resources to get the job done and the truth about Obama out.

Then my favorite.....

in small print at the bottom......

A portion of all contributions will go to support WND?s efforts, with another portion going to Sheriff Joe Arpaio?s Cold Case Posse, set to issue its report in February 2012.

:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO

Let me guess?...It is 80% going to WND while the other 20 % goes to Sheriff Joe?
Regardless Joe you need to send your Savior some money.And hey if you send over 20 dollars you will get Corsi's latest lies and smears in a e- book.Plus, hold on, plus you get the last book that is going for 99 cents at Amazon included!! :LMAO

tank · Dec 28, 2011

Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

tank said:
:LMAO:LMAO
WND: Time to support Arpaio's posse
Farah wrote:
Barack Obama's constitutional qualifications for the presidency have never been investigated by any law-enforcement agency.

Until now.

But that investigation by Sheriff Joe Arpaio's "Cold Case Posse" could easily be derailed for lack of financial support coupled with attacks being launched against his office by Obama's Justice Department.

That's why it is imperative for every American who questions the very legality of Obama's reign and his efforts at re-election to support Arpaio's probe in a tangible way ? no matter how small.

[...]

That's why I urge you to make a donation to this active investigation right now ? no matter the amount. If everyone who reads this appeal gave the minimum amount of $5, it would raise millions, far more than the necessary resources to get the job done and the truth about Obama out.

Then my favorite.....

in small print at the bottom......

A portion of all contributions will go to support WND?s efforts, with another portion going to Sheriff Joe Arpaio?s Cold Case Posse, set to issue its report in February 2012.

:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO

But that investigation by Sheriff Joe Arpaio's "Cold Case Posse" could easily be derailed for lack of financial support

:lol
Come on guys!!This ALL VOLUNTEER STAFF that is not getting PAID needs your money!!
:LMAO

tank · Dec 28, 2011

Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

tank said:
But that investigation by Sheriff Joe Arpaio's "Cold Case Posse" could easily be derailed for lack of financial support

:lol
Come on guys!!This ALL VOLUNTEER STAFF that is not getting PAID needs your money!!
:LMAO

And if this case goes nowhere it is all your fault for not sending money.
Your Savior is calling birfers so don't disappoint!!Like Farah say's ...even if many people only send in 5 it all adds up.

Must be really getting desperate at birfer headquarters.

tank · Dec 28, 2011

Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

:LMAO

-"Plaintiff is either toying with the Court or displaying her own stupidity."

https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2011cv0402-30

This describes all the birfers .All they have is stupidity!!

tank · Dec 28, 2011

Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

tank said:
:LMAO

-"Plaintiff is either toying with the Court or displaying her own stupidity."

https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2011cv0402-30

This describes all the birfers .All they have is stupidity!!

Again another Liberal Judge right Joe?
NOPE he was appointed by Reagan!!:lol

tank · Dec 29, 2011

Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

:3dapplaudir:BIRFER WAR!! :3dapplaudir:

[h=2]Wednesday, December 28, 2011[/h][FONT=Arial, 'Century gothic', verdana, sans-serif][/FONT][h=3]Response to Orly Taitz Regarding Subpoena to Hawaii Department of Health Director Fuddy[/h]OBAMARELEASE YOURRECORDS ON <a class="timestamp-link" href="http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/12/response-to-orly-taitz-regarding.html" rel="bookmark" title="permanent link" style="text-decoration: none; color: rgb(88, 140, 184); outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; "><abbr class="published" title="2011-12-28T14:56:00-08:00" style="border-top-style: none; border-right-style: none; border-bottom-style: none; border-left-style: none; border-width: initial; border-color: initial; border-image: initial; ">2:56 PM</abbr>

[FONT=Arial, 'Century gothic', verdana, sans-serif]Attorney Orly Taitz just made a false accusation against this site and claims she sent us a demand for explaination. Our repsonse follows Taitz's headline at her [/FONT]blog[FONT=Arial, 'Century gothic', verdana, sans-serif].[/FONT]

[FONT=Arial, 'Century gothic', verdana, sans-serif]"[/FONT]Demand for explanation sent to blogger Birtherreport.com and ObamaReleaseYourRecords.com, to explain, why did he remove the name of attorney Orly Taitz from the deposition of director of Health Fuddy, which was posted on his blog. See the original subpoena and an altered one from the blog ObamaReleaseYourRecords[FONT=Arial, 'Century gothic', verdana, sans-serif]"[/FONT]

Explanation from BirtherReport.com to Attorney Orly Taitz:

[FONT=Arial, 'Century gothic', verdana, sans-serif]See the original subpoena linked [/FONT]here[FONT=Arial, 'Century gothic', verdana, sans-serif] which was posted by Orly Taitz at [/FONT]her own blog[FONT=Arial, 'Century gothic', verdana, sans-serif] and see the one we uploaded to [/FONT]Scribd[FONT=Arial, 'Century gothic', verdana, sans-serif] and you will see Orly once again is wrong and is throwing around false accusations.[/FONT]

[FONT=Arial, 'Century gothic', verdana, sans-serif]Orly Taitz never contacted this site for an explanation. She simply aired it on her site as if she reached out to us when in fact she did not. This is one of the problems with Orly Taitz. She jumps to conclusions before finding out the truth of the matter and takes it to her blog publicly. She did this with Gary Wilmott, [/FONT]Article II Super PAC[FONT=Arial, 'Century gothic', verdana, sans-serif] and countless others. This must stop![/FONT]

[FONT=Arial, 'Century gothic', verdana, sans-serif]Let me be the first to recommend that you settle this with guns.[/FONT]

Joe Contrarian · Dec 29, 2011

Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

Attorney Van Irion Files Opposition to Obama's Motion to Dismiss in Georgia Ballot Challenge

OBAMARELEASE YOURRECORDS ON <a class="timestamp-link" href="http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/12/attorney-van-irion-files-opposition-to.html" rel="bookmark" title="permanent link" style="text-decoration: none; color: rgb(88, 140, 184); outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; "><abbr class="published" title="2011-12-28T20:15:00-08:00" style="border-top-style: none; border-right-style: none; border-bottom-style: none; border-left-style: none; border-width: initial; border-color: initial; border-image: initial; ">8:15 PM</abbr>

http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/12/attorney-van-irion-files-opposition-to.html

Attorney Van Irion on behalf of David Weldon Files Blistering Opposition to Defendant's(Obama) Motion to Dismiss in Georgia Ballot Access Challenge

OFFICE OF STATE ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS STATE OF GEORGIA

OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT?S MOTION TO DISMISS

The Plaintiff, David Welden, respectfully submits this opposition to Defendant?s motion to dismiss.

Statement of Facts

For the reasons set forth below, none of the facts asserted by the Defendant are relevant. The only fact relevant to this case is the fact that the Defendant?s father was not a U.S. citizen. This fact has been repeatedly documented and stated by the party opponent, Defendant Obama. This fact is also evidenced by Plaintiff?s exhibit 6, previously submitted with Plaintiff?s pre-trial order and apparently authenticated by Defendant?s citation to this exhibit in Defendant?s ?Statement of Material Facts Not in Dispute,? number 7.

{{{ JUMP TO PART C }}}

C. Right to Associate Doesn?t Negate Georgia Election Law

The Democratic Party of Georgia?s Constitutional right to determine its membership coexists with Georgia?s right to govern Georgia. Georgia code does not interfere with the autonomy of the political party?s internal decision making because it does nothing to prohibit the parties from submitting any name to the Secretary of State for inclusion in the Presidential primary. The Party is free to submit Saddam Hussein or Mickey Mouse as their next Presidential candidate. However, Georgia is not required to accept such submissions and waste taxpayer money on ballots for such candidates.

Georgia code does not prevent the political parties from submitting any name. Instead the code simply determines what the State does with the Party?s list of candidates after the Party has forwarded its list to the State. See O.C.G.A. ?21-2 et seq. This code does nothing to prevent any political party from excluding, or including, any person they choose to exclude or include. Nor does it prevent the Party from choosing candidates to submit, in its ?sole discretion.? Georgia?s code simply exercises the State?s right to administer elections in a manner that best serves the citizens of the State.

In the instant case Georgia?s Election code does nothing to infringe on the Democratic Party of Georgia?s right of association because the Party can and did include the Defendant in its organization. The Party can and did include the Defendant in the Party?s list of candidates. The Party?s rights, however, end there. Its rights cannot force the State to place the Defendant?s name on a ballot after the State determines that the Defendant is obviously not qualified ?to hold the office sought.? ?21-2-5. The rights of the Party and of the State simply do not conflict.4

The Defendant?s argument would logically require a conclusion that no state can preclude any candidate from any primary ballot for any reason without violating a political party?s right to freely associate. Since many candidates have been disqualified from primary ballots for lack of qualification to hold the office sought, we can safely conclude that the Defendant?s argument fails. If his argument succeeds, many election codes across the country will need to be re-drafted.

D. Defendant?s Conclusion is Offensive to the Constitution

The Defendant states that the issue raised by the Plaintiff was ?soundly rejected by 69,456,897 Americans in the 2008 elections.? See Def.?s Mtn. at 5. This statement reflects a complete lack of understanding regarding Constitutional protections.

Contrary to the Defendant?s assertion, voters are not the final arbiters of whether an individual is qualified to hold office. America is a Constitutional Republic, not a democracy without a constitution. In a Constitutional Republic the power of the majority is limited and cannot infringe upon protected rights of a minority.

The Constitution is an anti-majoritarian document; meaning that it protects individuals from invasions and usurpations by the majority. Constitutionally protected rights are held inviolate regardless of the majority?s desire to violate them. Without such protections any law enacted by Congress would be valid, even if it denied an individual their right to life, liberty, or property. Without the anti-majoritarian protection of the Constitution, Congress could legalize the killing of all Jews, for example, as was done in World War II Germany. Constitutional requirements are absolute, and must be followed regardless of how popular or unpopular such requirements may be, because they are in place to protect the minority.

The Defendant?s presumption that popular vote overrides the Constitution demonstrates his lack of understanding of the Constitution and emphasizes the critical role played by this Court in protecting Americans from a tyrannical majority. Contrary to the Defendant?s statement, a minority of Americans have an absolute right to be protected from a non-natural-born-citizen being elected President.

E. Contrary to the Defendant?s Assertion, No Court has Ruled on the Question Presented

The Defendant asserts that the issue raised by the Plaintiff has been defeated by ?every judicial body ever to have considered it,? citing dozens of cases. See Def.?s Mtn. at 5-6. However, unlike the instant case, every one of the cases cited was based upon an assertion that the Defendant was not born in the United States, or is not a citizen for some other reason.

The matter before this Court has nothing to do with the birth place of the Defendant, nor does it assert that he is not a citizen of the United States. In fact, limited to this challenged primary election, the Plaintiff will stipulate that the Defendant was born in Hawaii, that the Defendant is a U.S. Citizen, and that the Defendant was Constitutionally-qualified to serve as a U.S. Senator. The Plaintiff makes no assertion regarding the Defendant?s passports, or social security number, or any other fact related to the Defendant, other than the one fact asserted at the beginning of this opposition: that the Defendant?s father was not a U.S. citizen.

Contrary to the Defendant?s assertions, the issue presented by the Plaintiff is grounded on one uncontestable fact, and one clear definition from the U.S. Supreme Court. See Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162, 167 (1875).

F. Substantive Question for this Court

Despite all of his attempts to misdirect this Court from the one substantive issue presented, the Defendant has failed to present grounds for dismissal. The Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court consider his simple yet critically important grounds to prohibit the Defendant from appearing on the Georgia ballot:

It is undisputed that President Obama?s father was never a U.S. citizen. To Plaintiffs? knowledge Mr. Obama has never denied the fact that his father was not a U.S. Citizen, nor has he ever made any statements contrary to this fact.

The U.S. Supreme Court has defined ?natural-born citizens? as ?all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens.? See Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162, 167 (1875). The Court in Happersett did go on to state that other sub-categories of people may or may not be within the broader term ?citizen.? However, it did so only after specifically identifying the narrower category ?natural-born citizens.? Id. The Happersett Court clearly understood and established that ?citizen? is a much broader term than ?natural-born citizens.? Its discussion of ?citizen? does not negate or alter its earlier definition of the term ?natural-born citizens.? See Id. at 167-168. This precedent has never been questioned by any subsequent Supreme Court. This precedent is binding.

Because it is undisputed that Mr. Obama?s father was not a U.S. citizen, the Defendant can never be a natural-born citizen, as that term was defined by the U.S. Supreme Court. Therefore, the Defendant cannot meet the Constitutional requirements to hold the office of President. See U.S. Const. Art. II Section 1.5 Georgia election code requires such a candidate to be stricken from any Georgia ballot. ?21-2-5.

Conclusion

For the reasons set forth herein, the Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court deny the Defendant?s motion to dismiss.

Complete Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss below and here. Prior reports on the Georgia ballot challenges here.

ARTICLE II ELIGIBILITY FACTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html

Welden v. Obama - Opposition to Motion to Dismiss - Obama Georgia Primary Ballot Challenge - 12/19/2011

Joe Contrarian · Dec 29, 2011

Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

The clowns in Foggyville and Conspiracy La-La Land will never get it! :doh1

tank · Dec 29, 2011

Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

Joe Contrarian said:
The clowns in Foggyville and Conspiracy La-La Land will never get it! :doh1

Of course not Joe!!That is why they are always PROVEN RIGHT and when these cases go to court and they already know the outcome it just makes them look so stupid right.The Judges that RULE ON THE FACTS just do not know what they are talking about either do they?:LMAO
Everybody is wrong except the stupid birfers who are 0-87 in court cases and get their advice from places that want your money.I will give you dumbass's credit though...you are paying for Orly's son to go to a Ivy League School.:houraKeep sending money and thinking the outcome will be different then the other 87 cases.:shoot:

tank · Dec 29, 2011

Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

[h=1]Not just Obots[/h]by Dr. Conspiracy on <abbr class="date time published" title="2011-12-29T10:28:03-0500" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 1px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; border-image: initial; outline-width: 0px; outline-style: initial; outline-color: initial; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; border-bottom-style: dashed; border-bottom-color: rgb(153, 153, 153); cursor: help; ">DECEMBER 29, 2011</abbr> in 2012 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION, BIRTHER POLITICS, THE OBOTS, VIDEOS
I reject the term “Obot” to describe birther debunkers because it implies that birther debunkers do what they do in support of Barack Obama. In fact, many who wish the birthers would go away are Obama opponents, for example:
Republican Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, an advisor to John McCain in the 2008 election, said in a letter to constituents: “Every child born in the United States is a natural-born United States citizen except for the children of diplomats.” And what does Graham think about those who claim Obama was born overseas?

The people who are doing unfair and unkind things to the President, it says more about them than it does the Republican Party. What the Republican Party has to do … We have to say “that’s crazy.” So I’m here to tell you that those who think that the President was born somewhere other than Hawaii are crazy.

In a new [pre long-form release] poll by a Democratic organization, 51% of Republican primary voters believe that President Obama was not born in the USA. I do not believe that poll. … There is no question that Democrats are trying to marginalize Republican opposition in 2012 by painting them as nuts. This, the birther polling.

Karl Rove, in reply to O’Reilly in the same Fox News segment:

This is the White House strategy. … The President can come out and say “here are the documents.” But they’re happy to have this controversy continue because every moment the Conservatives talk about this, they marginalize themselves and diminish themselves in the minds of independent voters. … Look, he was born in Hawaii.

Within our party, we’ve got to be very careful about allowing these people who are the birthers and the 9/11-deniers to get too high a profile and say too much without setting the record straight,

2012 Republican candidate Mitt Romney told CNBC:

I think the [Obama] citizenship test has been passed. I believe the President was born the United States.

So you see, it’s not Obama supporters, but prominent opponents who think the birthers are wrong and a distraction.

tank · Dec 29, 2011

Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

Way to keep helping Obama you stupid fucks.:finger004

tank · Dec 29, 2011

Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

:LMAO
[h=2]Worcester lawyer can’t sue newspaper[/h]<small style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102); font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: justify; ">December 28th, 2011 | by Noah Schaffer |</small>A lawyer’s lawsuit complaining that a newspaper depicted him as a “birther” and a “dope” has been dismissed.Attorney Robert Delle sued the Worcester Telegram & Gazette for libel citing two separate articles. One was by columnist Clive McFarlane who, according to Delle, had engaged in a “confrontational” 30-second phone conversation before penning an article called “Birther’s True Colors Showing.” The article indicated that Delle doubted the authenticity of President Obama’s birth certificate and thought that the president is a Muslim. It went on to state that “this birther movement is mostly about the president’s race.”In his lawsuit Delle denies that he is a “birther” who thinks Obama is a Muslim and complained that the column depicted him as hating and respecting people of color. According to Delle, he had told McFarlane that he could not reach any conclusions about the authenticity of Obama’s birth certificate until he had a chance to study it.The other article in question was a news story that referenced a lawsuit in which Delle was involved in counsel. In the comment section one reader opined that “there was no bigger dope than Delle.”But Judge C. Jeffrey Kinder threw out the lawsuit, finding that any accusation of racism “centered on McFarlane’s interpretation” and was therefore protected speech.The claim about the comment was rejected because federal law mandates that the newspaper “cannot be held liable for comments posted to its website,” said Kinder. Dalle’s allegation that a Telegram employee had posted the anonymous comment was “entirely devoid of detail or elaboration,” added Kinder.Click here to order the full text of the opinion.

Poor little birfer had his feelings hurt.:houra

tank · Dec 29, 2011

Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

tank said:
Not just Obots

by Dr. Conspiracy on <abbr class="date time published" title="2011-12-29T10:28:03-0500" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 1px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; border-image: initial; outline-width: 0px; outline-style: initial; outline-color: initial; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; border-bottom-style: dashed; border-bottom-color: rgb(153, 153, 153); cursor: help; ">DECEMBER 29, 2011</abbr> in 2012 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION, BIRTHER POLITICS, THE OBOTS, VIDEOS
I reject the term ?Obot? to describe birther debunkers because it implies that birther debunkers do what they do in support of Barack Obama. In fact, many who wish the birthers would go away are Obama opponents, for example:
Republican Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, an advisor to John McCain in the 2008 election, said in a letter to constituents: ?Every child born in the United States is a natural-born United States citizen except for the children of diplomats.? And what does Graham think about those who claim Obama was born overseas?
The people who are doing unfair and unkind things to the President, it says more about them than it does the Republican Party. What the Republican Party has to do ? We have to say ?that?s crazy.? So I?m here to tell you that those who think that the President was born somewhere other than Hawaii are crazy.

<embed src="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f8/30183074001" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashvars="videoId=42981023001&playerId=30183074001&viewerSecureGatewayURL=https://console.brightcove.com/services/amfgateway&servicesURL=http://services.brightcove.com/services&cdnURL=http://admin.brightcove.com&domain=embed&autoStart=false&" base="http://admin.brightcove.com" name="flashObj" width="486" height="412" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" swliveconnect="true" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash">
How about staunch conservative commentator Bill O?Reilly?

<object width="448" height="252" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; border-image: initial; outline-width: 0px; outline-style: initial; outline-color: initial; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; "><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/GT1SXCQgv2A?hl=en&hd=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="448" height="252"></object>
Bill O?Reilly on the birth certificate in 2008

O?Reilly further speculated this year (February, 2011);
In a new [pre long-form release] poll by a Democratic organization, 51% of Republican primary voters believe that President Obama was not born in the USA. I do not believe that poll. ? There is no question that Democrats are trying to marginalize Republican opposition in 2012 by painting them as nuts. This, the birther polling.

Karl Rove, in reply to O?Reilly in the same Fox News segment:
This is the White House strategy. ? The President can come out and say ?here are the documents.? But they?re happy to have this controversy continue because every moment the Conservatives talk about this, they marginalize themselves and diminish themselves in the minds of independent voters. ? Look, he was born in Hawaii.

<object width="320" height="240" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; border-image: initial; outline-width: 0px; outline-style: initial; outline-color: initial; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; "><embed src="http://cloudfront.mediamatters.org/static/flash/pl55.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" flashvars="config=http://mediamatters.org/embed/cfg3?id=201102160042" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="320" height="240"></object>

Rove also said on Fox News:
Within our party, we?ve got to be very careful about allowing these people who are the birthers and the 9/11-deniers to get too high a profile and say too much without setting the record straight,

2012 Republican candidate Mitt Romney told CNBC:
I think the [Obama] citizenship test has been passed. I believe the President was born the United States.

So you see, it?s not Obama supporters, but prominent opponents who think the birthers are wrong and a distraction.

Cannot wait to hear the stupid response to this.Birfers are right and Rove and Graham are sell outs,duh,duh,duh doopity do.

Joe Contrarian · Dec 29, 2011

Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

tank said:
Of course not Joe!!That is why they are always PROVEN RIGHT and when these cases go to court and they already know the outcome it just makes them look so stupid right.The Judges that RULE ON THE FACTS just do not know what they are talking about either do they?

Yeah, 0-87 and yet not ONE has been heard or adjudicated.

What a surprise! :handjob:

tank · Dec 29, 2011

Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

Joe Contrarian said:
Yeah, 0-87 and yet not ONE has been heard or adjudicated.

What a surprise! :handjob:

They have all been heard and since you have no PROOF and have presented NO FACTS what do you stupid fucks expect??Do you honestly expect a Judge to go against the law of the land and allow OPINIONS to be used as FACTS?????Only in birfer world does this make sense.
PROVE something with FACTS instead of using the same old stupid shit that continues to get laughed out of court.
"Plaintiff is either toying with the Court or displaying her own stupidity."

https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2011cv0402-30

That is all the birfers have is STUPIDITY.They show it on a daily basis as evidenced by Joe!!:thumbsup You keep rehashing the same old shit that has NO PROOF or FACTS and you are dumb enough to think that by repeating it the outcome will somehow change.
Every case that WND rehashes will always have the same outcome but of course WND will continue to keep begging for money.My favorite is begging for money for Sheriff Joe's cold case squad that it working for FREE!!How stupid does one have to be to fall for this shit??

tank · Dec 29, 2011

Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

Joe Contrarian said:
Yeah, 0-87 and yet not ONE has been heard or adjudicated.

What a surprise! :handjob:

Every single one has been adjudicated.They have been ruled on and closed with a decision.
Your LIES and stupid shit is getting old.Name one case that has not been decided?
[h=1]What Does Adjudicated Mean?[/h]

Adjudication basically is a legal procedure via which an authority or judge evaluates evidence or argumentation which also comprises legal reasoning put forward by rival parties or litigants to come to a conclusion which decides rights and requirements among the parties which are concerned.

Keep showing us that you do not know shit and keep talking out of your ass thinking no one will notice your stupidity.

Joe Contrarian · Dec 29, 2011

Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

A dismissal based on a lack of standing is NOT an adjudication on the merits you idiot!

And now this desperate dumb fuck Obot lawyer in the GA challenge is making the absurd argument that 69 million people voted for the fraud...so that makes him eligible -- as if eligibility is determined by a popularity contest. :doh1

Notice how the nervous illiterate turds in Foggyville and Kook Underwear Blogger Planet are so obviously ignoring the substance of the Crime of the Century and instead are in full out Alinsky mode taunting and smearing the 'birthers'!

It just gets better and better!

:jerry

tank · Dec 29, 2011

Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

Joe Contrarian said:
A dismissal based on a lack of standing is NOT an adjudication on the merits you idiot!

Still trying to sound like you know what you are talking about!
Every single case has been ADJUDICATED!!!The Judge has ruled on it stupid!!Name ONE SINGLE CASE that is still open dummy!!!!!!

And now this desperate dumb fuck Obot lawyer in the GA challenge is making the absurd argument that 69 million people voted for the fraud...so that makes him eligible -- as if eligibility is determined by a popularity contest. :doh1
Taken out of context stupid.You dumb birfers are the ones claiming the election was a fraud.The Judge simply pointed out that 69 million Americans disagreed with your stupidity.

Notice how the turds in Foggyville and Kook Underwear Blogger Planet are so obviously ignoring the substance of the Crime of the Century and instead are in full out Alinsky mode taunting and smearing the 'birthers'.
BECAUSE YOU HAVE NOT PRODUCED ONE SINGLE FACT TO PROVE YOUR POINTS.THEY HAVE USED NOTHING BUT FACTS AND CAN PROVE THEM WHILE YOU STUPID FUCKS CANNOT DO THAT.SEE HOW SIMPLE THAT IS.

It just gets better and better!
Tell me about it.You dumbass's are just rehashing the same old debunked stupid shit that got laughed out of court and are dumb enough to think the outcome will somehow change.:houra

:jerry

Are all birfers this stupid??

Joe Contrarian · Dec 29, 2011

Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

"Only the Democratic Party of Georgia can determine qualifications of candidates named on the Presidential Preference Primary ballot. Furthermore, the citizenship issue the plaintiff seeks to raise was soundly rejected by 69,456,897 Americans in the 2008 elections, and it has been by every judicial body ever to have considered it. Every Georgia case considering the issue ruled against the plaintiff. Plaintiff's challenge to Barack Obama's qualifications should be dismissed."

-- Michael Jablonski, Obama's private attorney

THIS is the Obot legal argument?

:3dmdr:

tank · Dec 29, 2011

Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

Joe Contrarian said:
"Only the Democratic Party of Georgia can determine qualifications of candidates named on the Presidential Preference Primary ballot. Furthermore, the citizenship issue the plaintiff seeks to raise was soundly rejected by 69,456,897 Americans in the 2008 elections, and it has been by every judicial body ever to have considered it. Every Georgia case considering the issue ruled against the plaintiff. Plaintiff's challenge to Barack Obama's qualifications should be dismissed."

-- Michael Jablonski, Obama's private attorney

THIS is the Obot legal argument?

:3dmdr:

Yep!! Trying to say 69 million Americans are in on the supposed birfer fraud does sound pretty stupid I must agree.
Their legal argument is the same....they have PROVEN he is eligible while you stupid birfers have NOT PROVEN one single thing.If only your OPINIONS would be the same as FACTS you could probably get somewhere but until then......duh,duh,duh!!

tank · Dec 29, 2011

Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

ANOTHER LINE OF ATTACK, FILE COMPLAINTS WITH BAR ASSOCIATIONS AGAINST STATE OFFICIALS, WHO ARE ATTORNEY AND WHO ARE AIDING AND ABETTING IN OBAMAFRAUDGATE
Posted on | December 26, 2011
(excerpt) For example, my opponent in the current election is Senator Diane Feinstein. I traveled to DC and forwarded to a number of congressmen and senators info on ObamaFraudGate. They chose to be complicit. You can write an open complaint to CA bar and demand sanctions against her and even disbarment for being complicit and aiding and abetting all of the criminal acts, committed by Obama. If you are a resident of AZ, you can write an open complaint, demand for disbarment of Janet Napolitano.
I see that a number of people are frustrated with corruption in the judiciary. Don’t get frustrated and don’t just vent on the blogs or blogtalkradio, do something productive: you can file complaints citing judicial misconduct of corrupt judges and demand removal of those judges from the bench.
(source: http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/)

Um Orly....Feinstein is not even a Lawyer!!!!!:houra:houra:houra
And you dumbass's send her money????:lolxmas

Joe Contrarian · Dec 29, 2011

Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

tank said:
Their legal argument is the same....they have PROVEN he is eligible

No, they haven't.

Team Kenyan is surrounded by eligibility landmines!

On the very face of it, Obama is not eligible to be president. Every action he has taken under the color of authority as president should be repealed, negated and voided.If we take him at his word and accept at face value the evidence he has provided about his birth, he is simply not a "natural born citizen," as documented in Jerome Corsi's authoritative and best-selling book,"Where's the Birth Certificate?" The man he claims as his father was a Kenyan national visiting student who would have conferred foreign citizenship upon his son. The very purpose and intent of the "natural born citizen" clause of the Constitution's requirements for the presidency was to avoid any such perceptions of divided loyalty.

Worse yet, there are very grave doubts about whether his biological father was who he claims. All of Obama's biographical tales about this relationship have been called into question by the actual evidence.

Then we have the problem of Obama's apparent adoption by his mother's second husband, Lolo Soetoro, an Indonesian foreign national. Obama's name was changed to Soetoro and he moved to Indonesia with his stepfather, registering for school as an Indonesian citizen. Such an adoption would have required the destruction of the original birth certificate and the issuance of a new one showing Soetoro as Obama's actual birth father. That's the way adoption law works in Hawaii and most other states. So why didn't that take place? Why was his adoption not recorded? And if it was simply never reported to Hawaiian authorities, does it in anyway change the facts?

Then we have the problem of the birth document itself. It was only released last April in response to the impending release of Corsi's devastating book, which had hit the No. 1 best-seller position. But is it genuine? To date, there is nearly 100 percent agreement among qualified forensics investigators and document experts that it is not.

What I am saying might be very shocking. It might even sound a tad bizarre given the fact that the national media treats it as such. But what I have stated here is completely factual and well documented.

In other words, the man occupying the White House today and seeking re-election next year is a political enigma, an unknown quantity, completely unvetted and certainly not eligible to serve under the Constitution's simple, straightforward requirements for office."

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=381385

This is like Saddam Hussein -- so many reasons to take him down that its difficult to decide which one to focus on! :lolxmas

:jerry

tank · Dec 29, 2011

Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

Joe Contrarian said:
No, they haven't.

Team Kenyan is surrounded by eligibility landmines!

This is like Saddam Hussein -- so many reasons to take him down that its difficult to decide which one to focus on! :lolxmas

:jerry

If we take him at his word and accept at face value the evidence he has provided about his birth, he is simply not a "natural born citizen," as documented in Jerome Corsi's authoritative and best-selling book,"Where's the Birth Certificate?"

:houra:houra:houra:houra:houra:houra:houra:houra:houra:houra:houra:houra
As long as Jerome say's so!!:houra:houra:houra:houra:houra
What PROOF do you have to back this Jerome??I thought so!!Next......

Worse yet, there are very grave doubts about whether his biological father was who he claims

:houra:houraAnymore goalposts you want to move??Maybe make stupid claims against Grandpa too??Just when you think the desperate birfers cannot get any lower in their racist views they do.Pathetic!!But expected!!
. Such an adoption would have required the destruction of the original birth certificate and the issuance of a new one showing Soetoro as Obama's actual birth father.

More LIES!! You never lose your citizenship as has already been ruled on.Another baseless LIE!!

Then we have the problem of the birth document itself.

But, but according to one of your so called experts Tim Adams it never existed in the first place.PROOF please to back these stupid claims.Or better yet let's take this to court...oh already have and your Lies have not held up in court.

In other words, the man occupying the White House today and seeking re-election next year is a political enigma, an unknown quantity, completely unvetted and certainly not eligible to serve under the Constitution's simple, straightforward requirements for office.

Only in birfer world.He has met all LEGAL REQUIREMENTS and you have ZERO PROOF to back your lying claims and 87 Judges agree!!

tank · Dec 29, 2011

Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

as documented in Jerome Corsi's authoritative and best-selling book,"Where's the Birth Certificate?"

authoritative

:houra:houra:houraYet it contains ZERO FACTS and NO PROOF!!If only OPINIONS counted huh Jerome!!

tank · Dec 29, 2011

Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

Joe Contrarian said:
This is like Saddam Hussein -- so many reasons to take him down that its difficult to decide which one to focus on! :lolxmas

And they have tried 87 times and LOST everyone of them!!:LMAO:LMAO
Golly what can we try next??:lol

tank · Dec 29, 2011

Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

If we take him at his word and accept at face value the evidence he has provided about his birth, he is simply not a ........

Funny but America says the same thing about birfers.
ZERO PROOF to back these claims equals 0-87 in court cases.

tank · Dec 29, 2011

Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

tank said:
by Dr. Conspiracy on <abbr class="date time published" title="2011-12-29T10:28:03-0500" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 1px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; border-image: initial; outline-width: 0px; outline-style: initial; outline-color: initial; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; border-bottom-style: dashed; border-bottom-color: rgb(153, 153, 153); cursor: help; ">DECEMBER 29, 2011</abbr> in 2012 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION, BIRTHER POLITICS, THE OBOTS, VIDEOS
I reject the term ?Obot? to describe birther debunkers because it implies that birther debunkers do what they do in support of Barack Obama. In fact, many who wish the birthers would go away are Obama opponents, for example:
Republican Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, an advisor to John McCain in the 2008 election, said in a letter to constituents: ?Every child born in the United States is a natural-born United States citizen except for the children of diplomats.? And what does Graham think about those who claim Obama was born overseas?
The people who are doing unfair and unkind things to the President, it says more about them than it does the Republican Party. What the Republican Party has to do ? We have to say ?that?s crazy.? So I?m here to tell you that those who think that the President was born somewhere other than Hawaii are crazy.

<embed src="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f8/30183074001" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashvars="videoId=42981023001&playerId=30183074001&viewerSecureGatewayURL=https://console.brightcove.com/services/amfgateway&servicesURL=http://services.brightcove.com/services&cdnURL=http://admin.brightcove.com&domain=embed&autoStart=false&" base="http://admin.brightcove.com" name="flashObj" width="486" height="412" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" swliveconnect="true" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash">
How about staunch conservative commentator Bill O?Reilly?

<object width="448" height="252" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; border-image: initial; outline-width: 0px; outline-style: initial; outline-color: initial; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; "><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/GT1SXCQgv2A?hl=en&hd=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="448" height="252"></object>
Bill O?Reilly on the birth certificate in 2008

O?Reilly further speculated this year (February, 2011);
In a new [pre long-form release] poll by a Democratic organization, 51% of Republican primary voters believe that President Obama was not born in the USA. I do not believe that poll. ? There is no question that Democrats are trying to marginalize Republican opposition in 2012 by painting them as nuts. This, the birther polling.

Karl Rove, in reply to O?Reilly in the same Fox News segment:
This is the White House strategy. ? The President can come out and say ?here are the documents.? But they?re happy to have this controversy continue because every moment the Conservatives talk about this, they marginalize themselves and diminish themselves in the minds of independent voters. ? Look, he was born in Hawaii.

<object width="320" height="240" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; border-image: initial; outline-width: 0px; outline-style: initial; outline-color: initial; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; "><embed src="http://cloudfront.mediamatters.org/static/flash/pl55.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" flashvars="config=http://mediamatters.org/embed/cfg3?id=201102160042" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="320" height="240"></object>

Rove also said on Fox News:
Within our party, we?ve got to be very careful about allowing these people who are the birthers and the 9/11-deniers to get too high a profile and say too much without setting the record straight,

2012 Republican candidate Mitt Romney told CNBC:
I think the [Obama] citizenship test has been passed. I believe the President was born the United States.

So you see, it?s not Obama supporters, but prominent opponents who think the birthers are wrong and a distraction.

Karl Rove and Lindsey Graham say STFU with your stupid shit.You are a DISGRACE to the GOP and you might as well put an Obama sign in your front yard since you stupid fucks are helping him get re elected.

tank · Dec 30, 2011

Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

The man he claims as his father was a Kenyan national visiting student who would have conferred foreign citizenship upon his son. The very purpose and intent of the "natural born citizen" clause of the Constitution's requirements for the presidency was to avoid any such perceptions of divided loyalty.

For comedies sake please PROVE this statement!!:houra

tank · Dec 30, 2011

Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

Then we have the problem of Obama's apparent adoption by his mother's second husband, Lolo Soetoro, an Indonesian foreign national. Obama's name was changed to Soetoro and he moved to Indonesia with his stepfather, registering for school as an Indonesian citizen

PROVE where Obama was adopted by Soetoro.

Joe Contrarian · Dec 31, 2011

Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

OBAMARELEASE YOURRECORDS ON <a class="timestamp-link" href="http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/12/atty-hatfield-files-motion-to-depose.html" rel="bookmark" title="permanent link" style="text-decoration: none; color: rgb(88, 140, 184); outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; "><abbr class="published" title="2011-12-30T20:11:00-08:00" style="border-top-style: none; border-right-style: none; border-bottom-style: none; border-left-style: none; border-width: initial; border-color: initial; border-image: initial; ">8:11 PM</abbr>

Georgia State Representative & ATTORNEY Mark Hatfield on behalf of Plaintiffs Kevin Powell and Carl Swensson filed a Motion for Leave to Take Depositions of the Chairman of the Georgia Democratic Party, Michael R. Berlon, and Georgia Secretary of State, Brian Kemp

OFFICE OF STATE ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS STATE OF GEORGIA

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO TAKE DEPOSITIONS

Read the superb Motion for Leave to Take Depositions here: http://www.art2superpac.com/georgiaballot.html

Attorney Mark Hatfield on behalf of Plaintiffs Kevin Powell and Carl Swensson filed a motion for severance and for separate hearing

Excerpt from Motion for Severance and for Separate Hearing:

Plaintiffs Swensson and Powell, jointly represented by undersigned counsel, wish for their two cases to remain consolidated with each other. However, Plaintiffs Swensson and Powell desire that their cases be severed, and that they jointly be granted a separate trial, from the cases of Plaintiffs Farrar; Lax; Judy; Malaren; and Roth.

7.

Plaintiffs Swensson and Powell are challenging the candidacy of Defendant Obama on the singular ground that Defendant does not meet the "natural born Citizen" requirement of Article II, Section I, Clause 5 of the United States Constitution.

8.

Plaintiffs Farrar; Lax; Judy; Malaren; and Roth, however are raising issues not only pertaining to the "natural born Citizen" requirement, but also issues of Social Security and elections fraud; identity theft; and issues regarding the placement of additional candidates on the Georgia ballot. Said Plaintiffs are additionally seeking, in addition to Defendant's removal from the Georgia ballot, that Defendant be 'prosecuted' by this Court. Plaintiffs Swensson and Powell are not seeking anything from this Court beyond a ruling that Defendant Obama does not meet the "natural born Citizen" requirement and that Defendant be declared ineligible to be placed on the Georgia ballot for the Presidency of the United States.

Read the complete Motion for Severance and for Separate Hearing here: http://www.art2superpac.com/georgiaballot.html

Please visit www.Article2LegalDefenseFund.com and consider making a secure donation to help cover the legal expenses associated with this case.

ARTICLE II ELIGIBILITY FACTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html

MAKE A PAC CONTRIBUTION HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/donate.html

Kevin Powell / Carl Swensson v Barack Obama, Motion for Leave to Take Depositions, GA Ballot Challenge, 12-...

tank · Dec 31, 2011

Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

[h=1]2011: The year of the long form[/h]by Dr. Conspiracy on <abbr class="date time published" title="2011-12-31T12:33:03-0500" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 1px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; border-image: initial; outline-width: 0px; outline-style: initial; outline-color: initial; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; border-bottom-style: dashed; border-bottom-color: rgb(153, 153, 153); cursor: help; ">DECEMBER 31, 2011</abbr> in 2012 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION, BIRTHERS, DONALD TRUMP, JEROME CORSI,LOUNGE, WORLDNETDAILY

Thinking back over the past year, I think no single event more influenced the birther movement than the release by the White House of a certified copy of Barack Obama’s original Certificate of Live Birth from Hawaii, shown here in a photo taken by NBC News correspondent Savannah Guthrie at a White House news conference.
The document’s release in April had two almost immediate consequences. First, many casual doubters, those whose doubts stemmed primarily from the fact that the President hadn’t responded to demands to release the document, were satisfied that Obama was born in Hawaii just as the Encyclopedia Britannica said. The long-form certificate refuted claims that Obama’s registration was fraudulent, submitted by a relative: it clearly shows Obama was born in the Kapi’olani hospital and delivered by physician David A. Sinclair. Birther poll numbers dropped sharply.
The presidential aspirations of real estate mogul and TV host Donald Trump (who some credit with forcing Obama’s hand in releasing the certificate) were dashed as Trump’s TV appearances questioning Obama’s place of birth backfired in the light of new evidence. Author Jerome Corsi, whose book Where’s the Birth Certificate? was about to be released, also became a laughingstock.
The second result was that the remnant birthers began to make new claims that the newly-released Certificate was a fake, despite official statements from Hawaii to the contrary. WorldNetDaily published articles from many self-proclaimed “experts” claiming that various artifacts in the PDF file image of the certificate from the White House web site proved it was a fake. This lead to the publication of the first book specifically to take on birther claims, John Woodman’s Is Barack Obama’s Birth Certificate a Fraud? Tea Party conservative Woodman made quick work of debunking the fraud claims.
Over time Birther emphasis shifted from the place of Obama’s birth (as a growing consensus rejected the born in Kenya theory) to his parentage where they were on more factual ground. The President’s father was undisputedly not a US Citizen. However, all recognized authorities who have commented on presidential eligibility have said that persons born US Citizens in the United States are unquestionably natural born citizens, as required by the Constitution.
If I may be so bold, I predict that the year 2012 will be “the year of the ballot challenge”, with birthers focusing their efforts on proving their claims in court cases related to the President being on the 2012 Presidential Ballot.

Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

EOG Dedicated

2

EOG Dedicated

EOG Dedicated

2

EOG Dedicated

EOG Dedicated

EOG Dedicated

EOG Dedicated

EOG Dedicated

EOG Dedicated

EOG Dedicated

EOG Dedicated

EOG Dedicated

EOG Dedicated

2

2

EOG Dedicated

EOG Dedicated

EOG Dedicated

EOG Dedicated

EOG Dedicated

2

EOG Dedicated

EOG Dedicated

2

EOG Dedicated

2

EOG Dedicated

EOG Dedicated

2

EOG Dedicated

EOG Dedicated

EOG Dedicated

EOG Dedicated

EOG Dedicated

EOG Dedicated

EOG Dedicated

2

EOG Dedicated