[/b]
No, you weren't. 2938u4ji23
Hitler knew the power of injecting race into politics and these statists lust for power more than killing babies or involving themselves in acts of sodomy.
The race card is the "precious" and Hussein is Gollum.
For years, the loony left has been working hard at erasing all history of their racist past (democrats were rabidly anti-black until the 60's), they have convinced themselves -- and lemmings like 4625 -- that they are the only ones who are righteous, compassionate, and pure enough to define and dictate racial justice.
And yet these leftists are as racist as they ever.
But years of indoctrinating school children and college students in an Orwellian-type of the "opposites" game -- with "conservatives are racist; democrats are inclusive" added to Orwell's "freedom is slavery; ignorance is strength" -- new generations are convinced that electing someone to office based on his/her ethnic background, instead of character, honesty, and knowledge of the subject, is not only acceptable, but also good for "righting past wrongs."
Did it ever occur to Sonia Sodomy that this daughter of a Puerto Rican tool-and-die worker and a nurse, succeeded because so many Americans made a conscious effort to look past the racism and class warfare she engages in?
I hate leftists.
I hate leftists!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The New Racism: The Case Against Sonia Sotomayor
<small class="commentmetadata"> By
HHR | May 28th, 2009 | Category:
Featured,
Opinion | </small>
By Leette Eaton-White
With the nomination of Judge Sotomayor every American needs to scrutinize her in an effort to determine if she will be a good Supreme Court Justice. But so far very few with the power to determine her fate have done so. One of HHR?s contributors Raynard Jackson, said ?I hope and pray that Republicans won?t revert back to their natural inclination of injecting race into this battle.? Well he is dead wrong. Some of the people interjecting race are Chuck Schumer and even Judge Sotomayor.
Both have used her race as the qualifying factor.Schumer expressed the idea that if Republicans go hard on her they will further alienate themselves from Hispanic voters that they ?oppose her at their peril?. Well I have news for Schumer, if the Republicans don?t go hard on her they are every bit as racist as democrats are proving themselves to be. Since when do we get rid of racism by replacing it with racism? Think of what that statement is saying. As if going hard on her is racist! If they go easy on her then they imply that she can?t handle defending her rulings and beliefs.
If they go easy on her they imply that she is too stupid or weak to defend herself?. And that would be implied because of her race. That would be incredibly racist. Republicans should respect her by challenging her as best they can. The best way to show her abilities is to show them under pressure, not at a meeting for afternoon tea.
And let us examine the words of Judge Sotomayor herself.
?I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experience would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn?t lived that life.?
?
Sonia Sotomayor,
2001 ceremony commemorating the 40th anniversary of the first judicial appointment of a Latino to a federal court
Oh really Sonia Sotomayor? Really? Because said Latina is a women? Because she is Latina? Does she have a rich experience because of gender and race? Frankly if you ask my opinion none of that qualifies anyone to be a judge of any sort. But then again I am not even the least bit racist or sexist.
But time and time again liberals prove themselves to be such by requiring that we look at a person?s race before their merit, going directly against Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King?s message over and over again even while they claim to champion his ideas. I think that based on that statement alone she should step away from the nomination. Her words on race are, in my humble opinion, bigoted in nature and may suggest she is an ideologue. No one with such a cut off sense of race and gender should be on the most powerful court in the United States. For those of you not sure about my opinion on the matter examine this statement.
?I would hope that a wise white male with the richness of his experience would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a Latina woman who hasn?t lived that life.?
What bigot said that?! No one actually said that, but it displays how racist and sexist the statement is. If a white man had said that he would be vilified and forced to walk away. So often we expect that the most racist amongst us would be white people, but liberals prove over and over that is not the case.
The new racism tells us to embrace the false dichotomy that whites are racist or ignorant of other races at best, and all other races deserve an easier ride, a more favorable view and a better chance because of past wrongs perpetuated by whites.
This is not justice; this is not correcting a wrong. It is just another wrong. You cannot right a wrong with another wrong. You don?t excuse bad behavior by pointing at other bad behavior. We shouldn?t judge people by race and give them a hard or easy time because of it. Anyone seeking a position of power should be grilled before they assume power.
Suggesting that anyone wishing to challenge the ideas of people of a different race simply because of race is discriminatory. Trying to suppress free speech by way of intimidation is wrong at best. Mr. Jackson also made another statement in his HHR article ?Picking Sotomayor basically buys off the Hispanic community and will prevent them from bugging the administration about illegal immigration.?
If you are Hispanic and reading this you should be furious. Not with Mr. Jackson, it isn?t his fault that he is right. Its Obama?s fault that this is so.
You should be furious with him. He wants you to ignore issues by looking at this woman?s race alone (encouraging you to be racist) and to forget all concerns you have as an American? not a Latino. Our leaders are depending on you to be blind to issues and concerned only for race.
Assuming that because you are Latino you must think a certain way, and must act a certain way, and must vote a certain way based on nothing of real value? just race. That is a racist insult to your ability to reason as an adult and to make important decisions for this nation as an American.
No one should be able to do that to you.
If we are to judge the ability of this woman to be on the Supreme Court we must ignore her race all together and examine her words, her beliefs, and her judgments in court. This is the only fair way. I already think she should be sidelined based on her statements, but for those who think that is not enough it is important that she be taken to task in a respectful manner she deserves nothing less if she is as capable as liberals claim.
Leetteis a native New Yorker and a full time student studying Forensic Psychology. She has been a Conservative Republican since 2002, finding her Republican roots at the age of 15. HipHopRepublican opened the gateway for her to start her political activism in urban areas and across the net.Contact - Leette4hhr@gmail.com