Re: Venezuela Chavez says "Comrade" Obama more left-wing
There has been no evidence of any substantive changes since I posted the following in another thread in May, 2009:
By failing to utter a peep in protest when the buffoon's administration undertook the identical "economic policies," the poster running the "bit" known as Munchkin Man revealed that the "economic policies" of Hussein (who is a black man very near the white women, I might add) aren't really the issue of protest. Since the stated issue of protest has been revealed to be false, an inference arises that there is another, more authentic reason for protesting against Hussein (who is a black man very near the white women, I might add). Since the poster running the "bit" known as Munchkin Man remains publicly committed to the pretextual "economic policies" reason for protest in spite of clear evidence that such policies were peachy-keen in his book when undertaken by the buffoon, it is reasonable to presume that another, perhaps less savory issue is the true reason for protesting Hussein (who is a black man very near the white women, I might add).
http://forums.eog.com/politics-and-...ml?highlight=obama+buffoon+identical+policies
Greetings Mr. 4625:
The Munchkin Man has already posted a logical disproof and rebuttal of your assertions above and which were originally expressed in the post to which you are referring in the link above.
To wit:
<TABLE class=tborder id=post2135599 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=3 width="100%" align=center border=0><TBODY><TR vAlign=top><TD class=alt1 id=td_post_2135599 style="BORDER-RIGHT: #2b295e 1px solid">
Quote:
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=3 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=alt2 style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px inset; BORDER-TOP: 1px inset; BORDER-LEFT: 1px inset; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px inset">
Originally Posted by 4625
By failing to utter a peep in protest when the buffoon's administration undertook the identical "economic policies," the poster running the "bit" known as Munchkin Man revealed that the "economic policies" of Hussein (who is a black man very near the white women, I might add) aren't really the issue of protest.
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
Greetings 4625:
This is a false and presumptuous argument.
You are stating that the economic policies of Barack Obama and those of his predecessor are "identical."
Do you know what "identical" means?
In mathematical terms, two elements that are "identical" are more commonly described as "congruent."
If two elements are "congruent", then they are "carbon copies" of each other.
Congruence is not the same thing as Similarity, which is another mathematical term the Munchkin Man suggests you learn.
Consider the following:
All circles are similar.
But not all circles are congruent.
Do you understand now?
Therefore, if the Munchkin Man can find one single difference between the economic policies of Barack Obama and those of his predecessor, then your argument will have become invalidated and proven false.
The Munchkin Man will now give these economic policies a look.
Ah!
Here is one difference:
Barack Obama has repealed the limitations on taxpayer funding for embryonic stem cell research.
Here's another:
Barack Obama has repealed the limitations on taxpayer funding for abortions performed overseas.
THESE ARE TWO MAJOR POLICY DIFFERENCES BETWEEN BARACK OBAMA AND GEORGE W. BUSH!!!
You claimed that their economic policies were "identical."
The Munchkin Man has just proven you wrong.
Here's another:
Did President George W. Bush ever order a major automobile company to merge with a smaller one?
No, he did not.
Barack Obama did when he ordered Chrysler to merge with Fiat.
Here's another:
Did President George W. Bush ever fire the CEO of a major automobile company?
No, he did not.
Barack Obama did when he fired GM's CEO, Rick Wagoner.
Here's another:
Did President George W. Bush ever propose $634 billion in higher taxes for socialized health care?
No, he did not.
Barack Obama did.
Here's another:
Did Presdent George W. Bush ever propose a $3.6 trillion budget?
No, he did not.
Barack Obama did.
Here's another:
Did President George W. Bush ever propose to limit tax deductions for charitable donations?
No, he did not.
Barack Obama did.
The Munchkin Man can go on and on.
However, the Munchkin Man has already made his point.
The Munchkin Man has disproven your assertion that the economic policies of Barack Obama and his predecessor, George W. Bush, are "identical."
The Munchkin Man has proven you wrong.
Quote:
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=3 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=alt2 style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px inset; BORDER-TOP: 1px inset; BORDER-LEFT: 1px inset; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px inset">
Originally Posted by 4625
Since the stated issue of protest has been revealed to be false.......
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
Wrong.
The Munchkin Man has just disproven your entire argument.
You continued the above statement with the following:
Quote:
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=3 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=alt2 style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px inset; BORDER-TOP: 1px inset; BORDER-LEFT: 1px inset; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px inset">
Originally Posted by 4625
......an inference arises that there is another, more authentic reason for protesting against Hussein (who is a black man very near the white women, I might add). Since the poster running the "bit" known as Munchkin Man remains publicly committed to the pretextual "economic policies" reason for protest in spite of clear evidence that such policies were peachy-keen in his book when undertaken by the buffoon, it is reasonable to presume that another, perhaps less savory issue is the true reason for protesting Hussein (who is a black man very near the white women, I might add).
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
Due to the fact that the Munchkin Man has just disproven the entire premise of your argument, all of the above has been rendered as null and void, and no further rebuttal is necessary.
Best Wishes,
Munchkin Man
</TD></TR><TR><TD class=alt2 style="BORDER-RIGHT: #2b295e 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: #2b295e 0px solid; BORDER-LEFT: #2b295e 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: #2b295e 1px solid">
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
For full documentation of the above, the Munchkin Man refers you to Post Number 28 ot the following thread:
http://forums.eog.com/politics-and-...ml?highlight=obama+buffoon+identical+policies
It is possible that you missed the Munchkin Man's rebuttal which the Munchkin Man has just copied and pasted above.
For some reason, the Munchkin Man's Post 28 in this thread did not originally appear.
The Munchkin Man had to set his preferences to showing the most recent post in a given thread first, in a reverse chronological order.
When the Munchkin Man set his preferences accordingly, the Munchkin Man's Post 28 appeared in this thread on the Munchkin Man's computer screen.
Another logical fallacy to your argument is your assertion that the Munchkin Man's stated that his opposition and resistance to Barack Obama's Presidency was exclusively limited and confined to his "economic policies" alone.
This is untrue.
For example, the Munchkin Man bases a very large part of his opposition and resistance to Barack Obama on Barack Obama's support for the murder of a newborn baby after a failed abortion attempt, on behalf of honoring the mother's original wishes and protecting her "right to choose" to such an extreme.
The Munchkin Man is also opposed to Barack Obama's agenda to close Gitmo.
The Munchkin Man is also opposed to Barack Obama's view of American exceptionalism, as portrayed in the following quote from his recent speech in Cairo:
_____
"Given our interdependence, any world order that elevates one nation or group of people over another will inevitably fail."
_____
The Munchkin Man can go on and on, with one philosophical difference after another, on other issues besides his "economic policies."
Finally, you failed to refute the Munchkin Man's following statement:
To dispute your belief even further, the Munchkin Man would forsee no personal resistance to Clarence Thomas or Thomas Sowell or Walter Williams or Alan Keyes, to name just a few distinguished African-American gentleman the Munchkin Man admires, if any of them were President.
The Munchkin Man is genuinely astonished that an attorney, such as yourself, would commit so many logical fallacies during the course of an argument and come up with such a high volume of false conclusions that you do.
Best Wishes,
Munchkin Man
<TABLE class=tborder id=post2135599 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=3 width="100%" align=center border=0><TBODY><TR vAlign=top><TD class=alt1 id=td_post_2135599 style="BORDER-RIGHT: #2b295e 1px solid">
</TD></TR><TR><TD class=alt2 style="BORDER-RIGHT: #2b295e 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: #2b295e 0px solid; BORDER-LEFT: #2b295e 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: #2b295e 1px solid">
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>