NE +3.5 -226
Den +3.5 -223
Phi +3.5 -212
AZ +10.5 -255
Jax -14.5 +320 (borderline)
Sea -14.5 +270 (no way) same base numbers as Jax and 50 cents cheaper.
Pitt -14.5 +233
Phi -7.5 +248(that game works both ways) definate shade to Dallas in that match up
Don't like how everything is shaded to the 3.5 that is for sure. Doesn't open up a lot of possibilities. They basically look like what I saw last time. Some with some SLIGHT value, but most with little or none.
A lot beter in games with 5 or less point faves. This week too many high faves to work with from what I see.
If they let you have the dog -3 and not 3,5 would offer some more options, but snce they are al on the 3.5 (whch is smart) it forses you to make amove, but the value isn't there.
AZ is a good example. They are +3.5/4 (-107) @ Det. If you take them ML you can get +175, but if you take them -3.5 you are only getting +273. So basically you get a dollar more, but they pretty much have to win by a TD. But that isn't an option, since the high side offers +10.5 -255. THAT does hold some value. Basically getting a full TD for 250. And that buy up covers some pretty decent numbers (6,7,10)
Like I said in that thread, they are not offering enough variety to open themselves up to omuch to get hurt. Plus they have a low limit on them. Not sure what it is, but probably 2K max. So even if you were looking to take alead or buy back somewhere it isn't really worth it.
The ones I listed are strictly from a probability and pay off stand point, not from an opinion based one. But when they are severely limitting what you can do it is hard to figure out what is what. All you can do is compare what they show and hope they are "right". Which I don't thinkthey are.I think they are under valuing some of the teams and overvaluing others. So their numbers are somewhat biased and opinionated...but what else is new.