Why is Mickelson only -130 vs Tiger

#6
Re: Why is Mickelson only -130 vs Tiger

What do you think about this one, Birdie?

<table style="width: 447px;" id="tblGolfMajorsGame" class="lines" rgfloat="440,600" width="" border="0" bordercolor="#111111" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr class="linesCommentsRow"><td colspan="8"><cite>Woods & Mickelson must tee off for action</cite></td></tr><tr class="linesRow" valign="bottom"><td>Thu 6/17</td><td>
</td><td>95 Woods/Mickelson wins US Open 2010</td><td>
</td><td><input id="editx" name="M1_2" size="4" maxlength="5"> +320 </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr class="linesRowBot" valign="top"><td>10:00AM </td><td>
</td><td>96 Field wins US Open 2010</td><td> </td><td><input id="editx" name="M2_2" size="4" maxlength="5"> -390 </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr></tbody></table>
 
#11
Re: Why is Mickelson only -130 vs Tiger

I hate golf in every form. I wouldn't waste my time playing that crap if you paid me. And I certainly wouldn't waste any time capping it!
 
#13
Re: Why is Mickelson only -130 vs Tiger

I wouldn't waste any time watching it
I can't even understand why people PLAY it, let alone WATCH that pointless shit! Out of shape old farts can excel in golf. Means it's a game of skill but not a SPORT. I like watching ATHLETICS, not games of skill. For that matter I'd rather watch billiards or bowling.
 
#14
Re: Why is Mickelson only -130 vs Tiger

Now some smart ass will say "Tiger Woods is an athlete." Sure, Tiger is athletic and can likely play other sports well. That doesn't make golf a sport. Analogy: If Kobe Bryant becomes a bowler, does that make bowling an athletic activity? How about if he decides to play billiards? Does that make billiards a "sport"? Sorry, guys, golf is a GAME of SKILL. Old out of shape farts playing golf are NOT engaging in athetics!

Basketball, tennis, soccer >>>> SPORTS

Golf, bowling, billards, darts >>>> GAMES of SKILL

Get it yet? Good. Clear thinking is a beautiful thing. :)
 
#18
Re: Why is Mickelson only -130 vs Tiger

LAST TIME THE US OPEN WAS AT PEBBLE BEACH TIGER WOODS WON BY 14 SHOTS HE WAS THE ONLY GOLFER UNDER PAR AND HAD A 10 SHOT GOING INTO SUNDAY.

I GUESS TIGER LIKES PEBBLE BEACH HUH FELLAS :thumbsup

BE CAREFULL WITH THIS BET THIS COURSE IS WIDE OPEN AND IF TIGER CANT BE IN TREES HE IS ALWAYS DANGEROUS :thumbsup
 
#19
Re: Why is Mickelson only -130 vs Tiger

Beantown...you are starting to make sense in your last couple of posts about Tiger and Pierce...I knew you had it in you....
 
#22
Re: Why is Mickelson only -130 vs Tiger

Mickelson for the max.

Until Tiger gets his shit together, he is just another golfer. His mental game is destroyed. He is killing people with crowd burners. His swing is out of control.

Tiger has a long way to go to get back to the top.

Tiger needs to get divorced and get himself back out there. This guy needs various pussy to make him happy. If he "really" cared for his family he would have not taken on so many other chicks.

Tiger needs a divorce. Then he needs to sign up in the porn industry. He would never lose a tournament again.
 
#25
Re: Why is Mickelson only -130 vs Tiger

If you cant hit a stationary ball, you are a joke as an athlete. It is not a hard sport. You can say golfers are not athletes fine. But if you cant break 90 in golf, please dont consider yourself an athlete.
 
#26
Re: Why is Mickelson only -130 vs Tiger

Played Phil over Tiger at the Masters and the price was +130.
Played Phil over Tiger at Quail Hollow and it was +110.
Played Phil over Tiger at the Players and it was +100, although it closed -140.
Played Phil over Tiger at the US Open and had to lay -130.

Eventually Tigert might beat Phil head to head, but it won't be this week.
 
#27
Re: Why is Mickelson only -130 vs Tiger

if you cant hit the ball straight off the tee at a US Open, you are dead meat.

And Tiger has no idea where its going. Favorite bet is Furyk at + money vs Tiger

Furyk is boring as all but he hits the ball straight and boring guys do well at US Open. See Hale Irwin, Curtis Strange, Zack Johnson. You cant score from the rough at a US Open. Furyk will hit it straight, Tiger wont

:pop:
 
#33
Re: Why is Mickelson only -130 vs Tiger

RAILBIRD THIS IS A U.S. OPEN PHIL MICKELSON NEVER PLAYS WELL IN ANY MAJOR BUT THE MASTERS:LMAO HE CAME IN WITH A SMOOTH 4 OVER PAR TODAY RAILBIRD NICE CALL :LMAO

PHIL MICKELSON OVER TOGER WOODS :LMAO:LMAO I WOULD TAKE THAT BET ANY TIME ANY WHERE :LMAO:LMAO

RAILBIRS STICK TO LADYS SOFTBALL AND LET THE REAL GAMBLERS PICK THE GOLF MATCHUPS :LMAO
 
#36
Re: Why is Mickelson only -130 vs Tiger

If you cant hit a stationary ball, you are a joke as an athlete. It is not a hard sport. You can say golfers are not athletes fine. But if you cant break 90 in golf, please dont consider yourself an athlete.

There are many professional athletes that play golf often that rarely or never break 90.
 
#37
Re: Why is Mickelson only -130 vs Tiger

There are many professional athletes that play golf often that rarely or never break 90.
a "professional" athlete is one who gets paid. Doesnt mean that they are talented. I can beat most "professional" athletes in most sports. Doubt you can find more than 10 people in the world who can beat me in golf and tennis.
 
#38
Re: Why is Mickelson only -130 vs Tiger

Also bet you cant find 5 more than 5 nfl qbs who have better baseball arm, and less than 5 mlb pitchers who have better football arm.
 
#40
Re: Why is Mickelson only -130 vs Tiger

<TABLE class=sportsTable border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR class=evenRow><TD class="position first">T93 </TD><TD class="player ">Phil Mickelson </TD><TD>75 </TD><TD>- </TD><TD>- </TD><TD>- </TD><TD>+4 </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

TIGER +1 through 9....
 
Top