choslamshe
EOG Master
What we see tonight from the Nats bats is what we always see when games matter
Just stealing at these odds...
Just stealing at these odds...
Why were the Cubs dogs?
- Thread starter choslamshe
- Start date
choslamshe
EOG Master
Re: Why were the Cubs dogs?
I've said it all along ...Cubs should be favored to win the NL based on their experience, recent form of the Dodgers and typical meltdown from both Dodgers and Nats at this time of year.
I've said it all along ...Cubs should be favored to win the NL based on their experience, recent form of the Dodgers and typical meltdown from both Dodgers and Nats at this time of year.
Re: Why were the Cubs dogs?
No they shouldn't. Cubs aren't nearly as good as last year.
No they shouldn't. Cubs aren't nearly as good as last year.
Re: Why were the Cubs dogs?
Sure. But they are a lot better than the Nats with a limp-gimp-Maxxy.
Sure. But they are a lot better than the Nats with a limp-gimp-Maxxy.
choslamshe
EOG Master
Re: Why were the Cubs dogs?
I'll take the Cubs with all their experience against an opponent who scored a few more wins but is known to crumble this time of year
I'll take the Cubs with all their experience against an opponent who scored a few more wins but is known to crumble this time of year
JavyBaez9
EOG Master
JavyBaez9
EOG Master
Re: Why were the Cubs dogs?
If Lester is normal playoff Lester and Arrieta is healthy, this team is just as good as last year. Same exact team except Davis for Chapman and Quintana for Lackey.
Dodgers, Indians, and Astros are better this year, that's the issue.
If Lester is normal playoff Lester and Arrieta is healthy, this team is just as good as last year. Same exact team except Davis for Chapman and Quintana for Lackey.
Dodgers, Indians, and Astros are better this year, that's the issue.
JavyBaez9
EOG Master
Re: Why were the Cubs dogs?
He had to walk Rizzo. Baker is so bad. Rizzo put on his typical clutch $ at-bat. Meanwhile Baker grabbing for a new toothpick.
He had to walk Rizzo. Baker is so bad. Rizzo put on his typical clutch $ at-bat. Meanwhile Baker grabbing for a new toothpick.
Re: Why were the Cubs dogs?
True. But the Cubs are not facing those teams now. This thread has the "perfect" title. Cubs > Nats, and superior to them with a Gimp-Scherzer.
True. But the Cubs are not facing those teams now. This thread has the "perfect" title. Cubs > Nats, and superior to them with a Gimp-Scherzer.
richsox24
EOG Master
Re: Why were the Cubs dogs?
That explains it then. I thought you could challenge fair/foul.
That explains it then. I thought you could challenge fair/foul.
JavyBaez9
EOG Master
Re: Why were the Cubs dogs?
which makes sense too, woulda been damn near impossible to overturn that based on the angles they showed. Getting a conclusive look on those plays down the line would require a camera in the corner of the bag.
which makes sense too, woulda been damn near impossible to overturn that based on the angles they showed. Getting a conclusive look on those plays down the line would require a camera in the corner of the bag.
Re: Why were the Cubs dogs?
Second-time-thru against the Nats number 4 and as Ronnie Darling just called it:
"Brizzo-Show"
Second-time-thru against the Nats number 4 and as Ronnie Darling just called it:
"Brizzo-Show"