Re: Betjamaica Dispute
I think anyone that has dealt with Scotty at BetJM would initially side with him -- there's a lot of scum in this industry but Scotty almost always stays above the pack.
When you have a guy that is told over and over again (by a message that pops up in his account) that he has nickel limits, then I really don't see where the complaint is. A giant pop-up message that you HAVE to click on that says "Don't go over nickel limits". To me, I would assume that if I DID go over nickel limits that I'd be setting myself up for something bad.
It's like a book telling you not to take your bonus money and split it up on opposite sides of one game to hit your rollover -- the software might very well let you do it, but they have specifically told you NOT to, so you are doing so at the risk of losing the bonus.
The fact that Pinnacle apparently has come along and closed out this guy's account as well should speak volumes. How many legitimate players does Pinnacle cut-off?
On one side you now have Pinnacle and BetJamaica -- it's not hard for me to choose sides...
But oscark, if you are telling the whole story and have nothing to hide then I'd say contact The Shrink. I've done some work with him over the years and watched him handle plenty of disputes. Say what you want about his past, but he is willing to get the necessary people on the phone and get to the bottom of the story -- and if you want your money then I'd say there's no downside to it.
What you usually find out is in complaints against reputable books like this is the players very rarely want the whole story to get aired. Looking at the circumstances around this story and those involved, I'd be very surprised if oscark actually gets on the phone with Shrink/Scotty/etc... and allows the whole story to come out.
I think anyone that has dealt with Scotty at BetJM would initially side with him -- there's a lot of scum in this industry but Scotty almost always stays above the pack.
When you have a guy that is told over and over again (by a message that pops up in his account) that he has nickel limits, then I really don't see where the complaint is. A giant pop-up message that you HAVE to click on that says "Don't go over nickel limits". To me, I would assume that if I DID go over nickel limits that I'd be setting myself up for something bad.
It's like a book telling you not to take your bonus money and split it up on opposite sides of one game to hit your rollover -- the software might very well let you do it, but they have specifically told you NOT to, so you are doing so at the risk of losing the bonus.
The fact that Pinnacle apparently has come along and closed out this guy's account as well should speak volumes. How many legitimate players does Pinnacle cut-off?
On one side you now have Pinnacle and BetJamaica -- it's not hard for me to choose sides...
But oscark, if you are telling the whole story and have nothing to hide then I'd say contact The Shrink. I've done some work with him over the years and watched him handle plenty of disputes. Say what you want about his past, but he is willing to get the necessary people on the phone and get to the bottom of the story -- and if you want your money then I'd say there's no downside to it.
What you usually find out is in complaints against reputable books like this is the players very rarely want the whole story to get aired. Looking at the circumstances around this story and those involved, I'd be very surprised if oscark actually gets on the phone with Shrink/Scotty/etc... and allows the whole story to come out.
