Brock Landers @BrockLanders217
@RandPaulie Ask "1" and JK if i can be reinstated at EOG to post, given the new code of conduct, there should be no issues. Thanks pal.
Can we get a weekly update of posters on the bubble who are playing their way out at EOG?
Maybe a "last 4 in" at the current time.
So I guess number 1 is the moderator...is it safe to say that?
And speaking of distrust, how about letting the posting body know who owns this place? It's hard to trust a website when no one knows who is paying the bills. Lots of scammers in the offshore world, how do we know EOG isn't owned by one of them?
Good to hear, you can start with Cristiano and Sauce
No answer to this fundamental question?
Just waiting for someone to start checking IP addresses....lots of ghost appearances the past week...
I'll address the question in a new post. But help me with a couple of questions of my own.
Do you know the owners of the other forums in this industry?
Also, as it applies here, what difference does it make if the site is owned by devil worshipers? Although it's pretty evident that if it that were the case, we would have left everything just as is. We are not selling you anything, nor are we asking you to trust us to send you're hard earned dollars to a particular place, in order to scam you. However, you would be correct in accusing us of wasting your time in asking you to come here to read something worthwhile and instead delivering mostly drivel.
We hope to change that.
I'll address the question in a new post. But help me with a couple of questions of my own.
Do you know the owners of the other forums in this industry?
Also, as it applies here, what difference does it make if the site is owned by devil worshipers? Although it's pretty evident that if it that were the case, we would have left everything just as is. We are not selling you anything, nor are we asking you to trust us to send you're hard earned dollars to a particular place, in order to scam you. However, you would be correct in accusing us of wasting your time in asking you to come here to read something worthwhile and instead delivering mostly drivel.
We hope to change that.
Do you know the owners of the other forums in this industry?
Also, as it applies here, what difference does it make if the site is owned by devil worshipers?
I'll address the question in a new post. But help me with a couple of questions of my own.
Do you know the owners of the other forums in this industry?
Actually EOG is the only sports gambling forum, that I post at, that I don't know the owners.
Forums that I post at:
RoughingThePunter.com, I know owners Jon Spevak (JonInOakland) and Jan Suchanek (Perpetual Czech).
Sportsmemo.com, owners Tim Trushel & Erin Rynning, et al, that took over the ownership from Tim.
LVASports.com, owner Anthony Curtis (a pseudonym) and chief contributor, Frank Betti.
ViewFromVegas.com, owner Dave Tuley.
Given the history of this site with scamming moderators like BallWonder and Tuckman, and the socialpath radio co-host David Glisan, it would be nice to know you don't actively promote employee scammers.
Were you ever part of SBR or RX?
1, if there is a problem and you are not available do we contact 2 ?
can 2 make a decision or must he consult with 3....
1,
Can you explain why Cristiano is allowed to post? He is the same account of user 'Ronaldo', which you recommended take a 90 day timeout? User 'Cristiano' made that account hours after that ban. Not hard to figure this one out.
And full disclosure, I am posting on an account due to being banned by a poor mod of EOG past 'Kingrevolver,' who banned me simply for calling him out on some shady behavior around here. I'd love to get my other account unbanned, but just so you know, none of these policies are going to work if people you decide to ban under the new policy can simply make a ghost account 30 minutes after and keep posting.
I'd recommend new ghosts not be tolerated. Starting with Cristiano. He was banned under the new policy, and should serve out his timeout or not be welcome here, like Meaty.
Good luck to the Cubbies this year.
Agree. Banning an account and then allowing that account to come back as a ghost is just like a dog chasing it's tail. Foolish policy.
It's obvious the powers to be believe that banning the handle, bans the nonsense, knuckleheads, goofballs and any other entity that may want to take a run at the handle. So be it, it maybe transparent, but it's a joke by not banning the "real person" behind the handle; and that should be first and foremost.
1,
Can you explain why Cristiano is allowed to post? He is the same account of user 'Ronaldo', which you recommended take a 90 day timeout? User 'Cristiano' made that account hours after that ban. Not hard to figure this one out.
And full disclosure, I am posting on an account due to being banned by a poor mod of EOG past 'Kingrevolver,' who banned me simply for calling him out on some shady behavior around here. I'd love to get my other account unbanned, but just so you know, none of these policies are going to work if people you decide to ban under the new policy can simply make a ghost account 30 minutes after and keep posting.
I'd recommend new ghosts not be tolerated. Starting with Cristiano. He was banned under the new policy, and should serve out his timeout or not be welcome here, like Meaty.
This is funny. Poster has been banned and came back with new names more times than anyone not named Henry Hill and he is "recommending" ghosts not be tolerated. Nothing against you Kerry this was just good for a laugh.
To be fair, I was originally banned on this forum because I called a poster Erik, a poster that he let everyone call Erik for 6 years. Kingrevolver decided I needed a permanent ban for that, and then ran off to join a rival forum a few days later. LMAO.
Never was I arguing anyone who has ever ghosted should go, but if they're laying down the law and cracking down, why would they let the first poster banned under the new rules circumvent the ban so blatantly?
I'll address the question in a new post. .
This is funny. Poster has been banned and came back with new names more times than anyone not named Henry Hill and he is "recommending" ghosts not be tolerated. Nothing against you Kerry this was just good for a laugh.
No one's arguing your point.To be fair, I was originally banned on this forum because I called a poster Erik, a poster that he let everyone call Erik for 6 years. Kingrevolver decided I needed a permanent ban for that, and then ran off to join a rival forum a few days later. LMAO.
Never was I arguing anyone who has ever ghosted should go, but if they're laying down the law and cracking down, why would they let the first poster banned under the new rules circumvent the ban so blatantly?