It's Tucker time

kane knowingly posting patently false lies and propaganda now.

Just unbelievable that you idiots are dumb enough to think that's even close to acceptable.
What's the penalty in here for posting content that's unacceptable? Just curious.

Is it something more than losing all credibility here?
 

kane

EOG master
Tucker the tool said the 17 year old had to murder two protesters to maintain law and order, how this asshole is allowed on the air is sad
 
So you have no problem with the 17 year old showing up at a protest and killing people, because it's the governor's fault

Got it.
Did I say that? The governor enabled it by not bringing in the National Guard.

If the kid wasn't defending himself or someone else, then he belongs in prison. But from the video I saw, he was the one being attacked.
 
Fox persuasively argues that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer arrives with the appropriate amount of skepticism about the statements he makes.

The guy gets sued for defamation, and Fox's defense is that the people who watch his show should know he doesn't tell them the truth. I couldn't make this shit up if I tried, and yet his followers believe all the bullshit he spews on a daily basis, LMAO. His bosses literally argued in court that people shouldn't take what he says seriously, too fucking funny
 
"This general tenor of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not "stating actual facts" about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in "exaggeration" and "non literal commentary"
 
The key words are "reasonable viewer", the average person who listens to that guy isn't a "reasonable" viewer, he or she is a right winger who will believe anything and everything he says. It's beyond funny that his bosses argument in court is that Tucker shouldn't be taken seriously because he doesn't state facts, but rather engages in exaggeration, and this is the right's go to guy for their info, not a surprise the people who watch his show are so grossly misinformed
 
Let me know when a host from MSNBC gets sued in court for defamation, and that person's bosses argue that the host shouldn't be held liable since the viewers should know that the host doesn't state facts but rather engages in exaggeration and non literal commentary, derp
 
Let me know when a host from MSNBC gets sued in court for defamation, and that person's bosses argue that the host shouldn't be held liable since the viewers should know that the host doesn't state facts but rather engages in exaggeration and non literal commentary, derp
Is this tucker thing bigger or smaller than Woodwards book?
 
Let me know when a host from MSNBC gets sued in court for defamation, and that person's bosses argue that the host shouldn't be held liable since the viewers should know that the host doesn't state facts but rather engages in exaggeration and non literal commentary, derp
It already happened, dumbfuck.

Rachel Maddow.

And she used the exact same defense that Tucker Carlson's team is using.

Good thing you idiots are so well informed.
 
Top