Biggest dog on the ML: Phils +220, thus:
MLB Phils +1.5 -102, risk 102 to win 100
NBA Orl/Bos Under 188 -102, risk 102 to win 100
NBA Hou/LAL Under 193 -106, risk 106 to win 100
NBA Boston -4 -111, risk 111 to win 100 (better seed loss in Gm1)
NBA LA Lakers -10 -106, risk 106 to win 100 (better seed loss in Gm1)
Looks like you overlooked something from one of the systems:
<TABLE class=tborder id=post2101272 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=3 width="100%" align=center border=0><TBODY><TR vAlign=top><TD class=alt1 id=td_post_2101272 style="BORDER-RIGHT: #2b295e 1px solid">This is a rather strong system, and it is playing on a team that just got their clcok cleaned.
Play on any NBA team that is off a 25 point or more loss providing they are facing the same team that beat them by the 25 or more:
This is now 42-22 ATS 65.6% since 1990, which is as far back as my records go.
SO PLAY ON THESE GAME 2 ANGRY TEAMS:
Play the dogs on the moneyline as well. The underdogs after a 25 point blowout loss. They have gone 18-20 straight up!!! That is 47.3% playing on moneyline underdogs, to an average underdog line of +6.33!!!
As you can see their are some very hefty moneyline winners
Seems like you have not credited the 25 point losers on the moneyline in their next game, which puts this into very positive territory!
</TD></TR><TR><TD class=alt2 style="BORDER-RIGHT: #2b295e 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: #2b295e 0px solid; BORDER-LEFT: #2b295e 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: #2b295e 1px solid">
For June 5:
Biggest dog on the ML: Rays +183, thus:
MLB Rays +1.5 -123, risk 123 to win 100
Also the NBA Under 4-game Martingale (chase) system finished at 15-0. This system wasn't tracked in this thread. I haven't yet posted my analysis of this system as proposed by Ned, but suffice it to say that system definitely has some merit primarily because of large line changes in the total as a series progresses. I'll post it back in the NBA subforum when I get a chance.