(using covers.com lines)
ATS: 25-19-1
SU: 16-28-1
totals: 23-21-1
remember he was injured for quite a few games so if you are just searching for the packers as a dog assuming he was the QB these numbers might be with the backup as qb.(using covers.com lines)
ATS: 25-19-1
SU: 16-28-1
totals: 23-21-1
remember he was injured for quite a few games so if you are just searching for the packers as a dog assuming he was the QB these numbers might be with the backup as qb.
if you searched only when rodgers was a starter then good info.
what is his record as an underdog in the playoffs? from what I recall not very good but I'm not sure[/QUOTE
ATS of years past when packers had different teams. So although it is something ( under valued when he starts) i cannot play it on just that stat. I would put more value on it in the same season. Smaller sample yes but team under valued all year..
Neither one necessarily has a full complement of playmakers around them.
At this point in their career, with a full complement of complementary playmakers, I'd rather have Rodgers than Brady if I had only one possession left at the end of the game to play for the win. Brady still makes clutch throws, but sometimes now he needs two or three extra plays during a drive to make them, whereas he used to more consistently go bip, bip, bip down the field, one clutch throw after another. You don't always get those second and third chances to make a play.
But, in the above situation of one final drive, again with a full complement of complementary playmakers, I'd rather have Russell Wilson than either Rodgers or Brady.
But I'm not sure that I'd relegate Brady and Rodgers to the lower 22 of NFL quarterbacks. To paraphrase Parcells, you can dial 1-800-QRTRBAK and still have a hard time rounding up many elite quarterbacks. It would be mildly interesting -- but only mildly -- to know Bell's 10 quarterbacks who edge out Rodgers and Brady and push them toward the bottom of the list.
* * *
So on that 25-19-1 ATS metric as a dog, was there any significant home/road split, if you have that handy?
#Backdoor
May be the best pass that I've ever seen
This is his new radio style...shock rail. He learned this from cowherd.lol RJ Bell saying today Tom Brady and Rodgers are comparable talents right now.
Rodgers not even a top ten quarterback according to Bell. JFC RJ
lol RJ Bell saying today Tom Brady and Rodgers are comparable talents right now.
Rodgers not even a top ten quarterback according to Bell. JFC RJ
Calling RJ Bell a Vegas expert, we may need a ruling.Yup..but not top ten according to Vegas experts...
I think the GB defense is much improved over the last few seasons. They also have a hot RB in Jones. Will it be enough? I think they have to let Jones win the game with ball control instead of Rodgers passing. That is how you stop a dymamic pass rush.Dont let anybody fool you homies. Its going to be the same shit just like against Vikings but GB is a tad bit better than Vikings.
I think the GB defense is much improved over the last few seasons. They also have a hot RB in Jones. Will it be enough? I think they have to let Jones win the game with ball control instead of Rodgers passing. That is how you stop a dymamic pass rush.
49ers will be all over Rodgers all day. He will get tired of getting hit hard. It wouldn't surprise me if the 49ers get up early and they are pressuring Rodgers he fake an injury.Dude. No matter how bad Rodgers has played towards the end, he is still Rodgers.
He is a BAD BAD man. He can find holes and whip passes into any defense when he is on. It would come to no shock to anybody with any sort of IQ and sound mind to see him lead the Packers to a victory over the 49ers.
the 49ers play a high percent of zone defense that takes away rodgers running chances. good luck.I know he doesnt like to run anymore it seems, but he wont be able to beat the Niners from the pocket alone
(I think he knows it)
$220.00$ 200.00 Pending1/19/20 6:40pm NFL Props Football 5715 A.Rodgers rushing yards/. Over 13½ -110*