Cognitve dissonance isn't exclusively an American trait, Correct. CD can be caused by a mind in turmoil . Cognitive dissonance IS a mind in turmoil due to religion,politics,ethics,business,personal problems,individual pyschology and a myriad host of other issues. Very partially true. Cognitive dissonance is a state of mental turmoil, or dissonance, when strongly held beliefs are confronted by contradicting facts and a very reasonable argument based on those facts which destroys or degrades the strongly held beliefs.
In the business world, we have something called escalation of commitment, which is a phenomena observed when people in possession of clear evidence that a previous decision is wrong, will continue to argue for, and implement, the wrong decision with an even greater commitment. I think escalation of commitment is a symptom or form of cognitive dissonance.
Attributing CD solely to average Americans is unfair because citizens of other nations have the same internal conflicts too.Admittedly citizens of the U.S. have to deal with more contradictions than most,and while this isn't an excuse many in the same circumstance would be wracked with similar mind storms. Excellent.
"Average" Americans are as defensive as anyone else when being criticized,that's why they're average and those from other countries are too,it takes the ability to rationalize and go beyond the ordinary to simply brush off unconstructive opinion,while being able to accept truth and adjust accordingly. Very good. It implies that such dissonance can result in personal improvement and new beliefs. That is not true for all, however. See Joey and his flag waving, for instance.
Many American's do believe in a God given right to dominate the rest of the world,and this is troubling as while this has been been the case in the recent past,it can't and won't continue, limits will be reached,and a new level of lifestyle that's sustainable will have to be implemented. That is very true and would seem to be the way things should go. The fear is that America will go on to kill whoever it needs to kill to ensure that it has access to other nations resources, i.e. mankind will not share for the benefit of mankind, but resources will be seized at the point of a gun, and those not killed by the guns will die from lack of essential resources. The country most at risk in that view is Canada, which controls much of America's future water and oil supply.
America has a further decline in store than most other nations and the transition to a lower energy profile won't be easy,but it will be required either voluntarily,or by force,habits will need to change. By force? Hence the new Obama doctrine that the President of the US can, without trial, order the murder of American citizens?
America can continue on its present course,to try and secure energy and resources worldwide,but the contradictions of doing so will ultimately outweigh the benefits of doing so.and make the endgame harder.