JIMMYMAC VS. ODDSMAKER DISPUTE: THE VERDICT

Re: JIMMYMAC VS. ODDSMAKER DISPUTE: THE VERDICT

I havent read everything and this may have been covered but what if he lost the bonus, and then they caught him passing the note. Do you think they would let him deposit after this act? I'll bet they would even give him a bonus on the reup and just (maybe) tell him to to pass the bonus to others.

BS move by a BS book. Glad I never funded there although I did set up an acct. Guess I need my lawyer to review the fine print at these POS books.
 
Re: JIMMYMAC VS. ODDSMAKER DISPUTE: THE VERDICT

That Shrinky he puts people in these stinky books and gets paid to hook people into sending them money and gets a rake off of their losses. Then lets these books that advertise and pay him money steal from posters and he takes the books side. What a swell guy. Bet at Matchbook and you don't have this horseshit.
 
Re: JIMMYMAC VS. ODDSMAKER DISPUTE: THE VERDICT

No, it really has been a mess.

These things tend to go much better when handled behind the scenes. Once it hits the forums things usually go poorly for the player.

Why players get involved with bonues in the first place is beyond me... The BEST bonus is low juice.
All these bonus whores Jimmy get fvcked all the time. Just bet a tMatchbook and 5 Dimes and screw the rest of these con artist books.
 

scrimmage

What you contemplate you imitate
Re: JIMMYMAC VS. ODDSMAKER DISPUTE: THE VERDICT



Do you think Shrink's decision and statement here was intended to drive traffic? There will be several outraged people posting several threads with 1000+ views over the next week on this.
If he had gotten the player paid, this whole scenario would have been over in an hour and forgotten!
THE SHRINK

Quote:
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=3 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=alt2 style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px inset; BORDER-TOP: 1px inset; BORDER-LEFT: 1px inset; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px inset">Originally Posted by BigOrange


Do you think Shrink's decision and statement here was intended to drive traffic? There will be several outraged people posting several threads with 1000+ views over the next week on this.

If he had gotten the player paid, this whole scenario would have been over in an hour and forgotten!


</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
"What a bunch of crap..."

ATX, im on the phone but feel the need to address one thing. We are not done investigating this at all. By no means are we done.
My reputation, as far as with players, is without flaw. You have no idea how much time and effort Ken and I are putting in to this.
uh oh, here we go.....Shrink is going to change his mind now
If people could only see. I thought one may by this point.



 
Re: JIMMYMAC VS. ODDSMAKER DISPUTE: THE VERDICT

This case seems very obvious to me.

Jimmy never got a second bonus, so no fraud. He needs to be paid.

The book doesn't give a SHIT about their reputation.
 
Re: JIMMYMAC VS. ODDSMAKER DISPUTE: THE VERDICT

This book will open up under another name for football and they will pay ol' Shrinky to sell you Rubes on opening an account with one of those silly $1000 contests.
 
Re: JIMMYMAC VS. ODDSMAKER DISPUTE: THE VERDICT





THE SHRINK

Quote:
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=3 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=alt2 style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px inset; BORDER-TOP: 1px inset; BORDER-LEFT: 1px inset; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px inset">Originally Posted by BigOrange


Do you think Shrink's decision and statement here was intended to drive traffic? There will be several outraged people posting several threads with 1000+ views over the next week on this.

If he had gotten the player paid, this whole scenario would have been over in an hour and forgotten!


</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
"What a bunch of crap..."











post of the week.

here's a link to the 2nd part in EOG's featured mini-series, "As the Shrink Squirms" :

http://forums.eog.com/online-sportsbooks-and-gambling-discussion/other-thread-so-massive-230594.html
 
Re: JIMMYMAC VS. ODDSMAKER DISPUTE: THE VERDICT

He has been behind this shit book for some time now. I gave them a try on the first shrinkathon and the odds group, what a bunch of crap then, looks no different now. No when to hold em and know when to fold em Kenny.
 

TonyMar

EOG Dedicated
Re: JIMMYMAC VS. ODDSMAKER DISPUTE: THE VERDICT

No, you don't usually get all the rules. There is usually small print at the bottom that leads you to the URL on their site you could read all the rules. This one lays out a few stipulations, and given they seem to give these VIP players special treatment, I believe a reasonable person could believe the rules in the email was what he was expected to follow, not some other rules that I still have seen in writing anywhere, can you post them please?

Thanks Mo
a reasonable person?

no way...

anyone with slight functioning...grey matter would understand that those two stip's were the rules set forth by oddsmaker...

&

their bigtime 'tony stewart'...

man oh man...:LMAO
 
Re: JIMMYMAC VS. ODDSMAKER DISPUTE: THE VERDICT

Why didnt they say something on saturday when it happened? Cant tell me once thursday hit a thought popped up in a clerks head. They have special ed kids running these joints.
 
Re: JIMMYMAC VS. ODDSMAKER DISPUTE: THE VERDICT

Here's how I see it.

Judge = Shrink
Oddsmaker has a great lawyer and presented a great case.
jimmymac is pro se.

New light has been shed and an appeal will be heard.

I think that Shrink is truly looking into the case again and it's good to see. :cheers
 
Re: JIMMYMAC VS. ODDSMAKER DISPUTE: THE VERDICT




That Scott Becker has not had pvssy since pvssy had him. Has to be one of the ugliest RubesRubes ever.
 
Re: JIMMYMAC VS. ODDSMAKER DISPUTE: THE VERDICT

The other three look like they need to be doing 20 years minimum. That Keith must have killed atleast a dozen.
 
Re: JIMMYMAC VS. ODDSMAKER DISPUTE: THE VERDICT

A real pathetic ruling. Player only played in his account and is confiscated after the fact. This may tell us how the poor economy is making this book so desparate to resort to stealing just 8k and risking their reputation. Sad, sad state of affairs. I would never send a dollar to this book and I'll make sure anyone I know does not. I also think the owner of this site appears to have no credibility or is just plain dumb for that ruling.
I couldn't agree more and made a similar post earlier in the thread. Horrible business decision by the powers that be at Oddsmaker.com. It will cost them substantially more than the 8k in the long run. It's too bad that they are not on the NYSE, as it would be fun to watch their stock drop like a rock as word gets out on the con artists running this company.
 
Re: JIMMYMAC VS. ODDSMAKER DISPUTE: THE VERDICT

Here's how I see it.

Judge = Shrink
Oddsmaker has a great lawyer and presented a great case.
jimmymac is pro se.

New light has been shed and an appeal will be heard.

I think that Shrink is truly looking into the case again and it's good to see.

The Shrink and I never stopped looking. That needs to be clear.
 
Re: JIMMYMAC VS. ODDSMAKER DISPUTE: THE VERDICT

The Shrink and I never stopped looking. That needs to be clear.
Who're you trying to shit. You have zero clout or respect in the offshore community. Few if any know who the hell you are. The ones that do, see you for what you are Shrink's flunky. Let's be honest here, you're no more than a glorified clerk. Who is big time, in your mind only! If a conference of Forum & SB honchos was called, you wouldn't be invited.:houra
 
Re: JIMMYMAC VS. ODDSMAKER DISPUTE: THE VERDICT

Who're you trying to shit. You have zero clout or respect in the offshore community. Few if any know who the hell you are. The ones that do, see you for what you are Shrink's flunky. Let's be honest here, you're no more than a glorified clerk. Who is big time, in your mind only! If a conference of Forum & SB honchos was called, you wouldn't be invited.
You have no idea. You never have.

:cheers
 
Re: JIMMYMAC VS. ODDSMAKER DISPUTE: THE VERDICT

Pay the Man...Why is the Shrink Judge and Jury....Is he the New Gambling God..I think not...let Oddsmaker be big boys and handle their own shit and not come for a Jokers opinion. Pay the Man he won it fair and square...they gave him free money and he took advantage of it. :cheers
 
Re: JIMMYMAC VS. ODDSMAKER DISPUTE: THE VERDICT

Pay the Man...Why is the Shrink Judge and Jury....Is he the New Gambling God..I think not...let Oddsmaker be big boys and handle their own shit and not come for a Jokers opinion. Pay the Man he won it fair and square...they gave him free money and he took advantage of it.

If posts like this got it done, it would have been done. This 'joker' you speak of is the person who has worked hard day after day and, if anything gets done, he is to thank.
 
Re: JIMMYMAC VS. ODDSMAKER DISPUTE: THE VERDICT

Greetings:

The Munchkin Man doesn't understand a bit of this.

Therefore, the Munchkin Man is not going to comment on something the Munchkin Man doesn't understand.

Best Wishes,

Munchkin Man
 
Top