Those numbers are higher than Sweden due to various reasons, such as bigger populations, "higher risk" populations, populations that are more congested, populations with more multi family & multi-generational living as opposed to people living alone, etc. So, again, you're comparing apples with banana peels & rocket ships. Your comparison is irrelevant. The only valid comparison is Sweden with its 3 Nordic neighbours. And that shows Sweden to be a horrible failure in its earlier pandemic response strategy of voluntary lockdowns. As i have shown you repeatedly, e.g.:
"Sweden has way more total deaths than their 3 Nordic neighbours (Norway, Finland, Denmark) combined while Sweden has a 50% larger population than the 3 of them combined. And Sweden is no better off economically. Clearly hard lockdowns, as occurred in those 3 nations, were the superior choice to Sweden's soft voluntary isolation approach.
Sweden dead = 5,918
Norway dead = 278
Finland dead = 346
Denmark dead = 677"
Recently initiated lockdowns are not the cause of the increase in autumn infections and deaths in Europe. Lockdowns are the solution to the problem. And BTW Sweden has changed their strategy to more of a lockdown strategy.