What happened to Kane’s thread for Dell Dude?

Dell Dude

EOG Master
Think about the comparison, difference. Stormy -> hush money nothing else. Steele -> FBI then Mueller investigation with indictments for noncents.
 

Dell Dude

EOG Master
This is fucking Columbia. A *prestigious Ivy League. They have basically canceled the rest of the term. This is the 2nd time since 2020.
 

Dell Dude

EOG Master
I realized college was bullshit when I went there. Ahead of my times. It was bullshit then and bullshit now except the mask is off and we see it raw.
 

Dell Dude

EOG Master
They had to repeatedly say nothing Pecker testified about is illegal. Then what the fuck are you doing covering this like Tony Homo at the Swifty Bowl?
 

Dell Dude

EOG Master
This is the same as CNN using Biden campaign sources right now to plant negative and sometime fake stories about Trump to help Biden.
 

Dell Dude

EOG Master
Any guilty verdict will be vacated with prejudice as will all the civil judgements but it doesn't matter. Damage done. Like howid they did Ted Stevens. Convicted him of bullshit and lost his Alaska Senate seat. Cleared later. I think he was even dead by then. They have completely corrupted and broken our legal system and it's one way traffic. They don't give shit if it gets overturned. They only want to deny Trump the White House. And they will be back for more because there is never any consequences. This stupid GD trial should be stopped short now. Today. As well as the other 3 and all the civil.
 

Dell Dude

EOG Master
United States v. Senator Theodore F. Stevens[1][2] was a criminal trial spanning from 2007 to 2009 of long-time U.S. Senator Ted Stevens as part of the Alaska political corruption probe. Stevens was the main source of coverage of the probe, being indicted by a jury on July 29, 2008[3][4] and convicted on 7 felony charges of corruption on October 27, 2008[5] which cost him re-election in the Senate race a week later.[6][7]

Stevens pled not guilty, publicly declaring "I'm innocent." Stevens asserted his right to a speedy trial and requested that the trial be held before the 2008 election.[8][9] U.S. District Judge in Washington, D.C. Emmet G. Sullivan, on October 2, 2008, denied the mistrial petition of Stevens's chief counsel, Brendan Sullivan, that made allegations of withholding evidence by prosecutors. Thus, the latter were admonished and would submit themselves for an internal probe by the United States Department of Justice. Brady v. Maryland requires prosecutors to give a defendant any material exculpatory evidence. Judge Sullivan had earlier admonished the prosecution for sending home to Alaska a witness who might have helped the defense.[10][11]

In February 2009, FBI agent Chad Joy filed a whistleblower affidavit, alleging that prosecutors and FBI agents conspired to withhold and conceal evidence that could have resulted in acquittal.[12] As a result of Joy's affidavit and claims by the defense that prosecutorial misconduct had caused an unfair trial, Judge Sullivan ordered a hearing to be held to determine whether a new trial should be ordered.[13] At the hearing, Judge Sullivan held the prosecutors in contempt for having failed to deliver documents to Stevens's legal counsel.[14]

On April 1, 2009, on behalf of U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, Paul O'Brien submitted an order to set aside the case. Federal judge Emmet G. Sullivan soon signed the order. Since it occurred prior to sentencing it had the effect of vacating Stevens's conviction. Holder was reportedly very angry at the prosecutors' apparent withholding of exculpatory evidence and wanted to send a message that prosecutorial misconduct would not be tolerated under his watch. After Sullivan held the prosecutors in contempt, Holder replaced the entire trial team, including top officials in the public integrity section. The final straw for Holder was the discovery of a previously undocumented interview with Bill Allen that raised the possibility prosecutors had knowingly allowed Allen to perjure himself.[15]

On April 7, 2009, judge Sullivan formally accepted Holder's motion to set aside the verdict and throw out the indictment, declaring "There was never a judgment of conviction in this case. The jury's verdict is being set aside and has no legal effect," and calling it the worst case of prosecutorial misconduct he'd ever seen.[16]
 

Dell Dude

EOG Master
There is no chance none zero nothing Joe Biden wins legitimately. It is at least a 1988 map. Anything above that is cheating.
 

Dell Dude

EOG Master
I am not some dipshit conspiracy theorist. I'm a cautious skeptic. When Trump does it, I take into account he may be trolling for the crazies. And he definitely does it. No question. But could be probably is trolling because he knows it will activate Joe Rambo. But this is Biden and he clearly went back to back with curious gaffes that are specific to Q.
 

Dell Dude

EOG Master
And it's not the first time. Biden has had these Q specific gaffes before. Like JoRa posts. howid many coincidences can there be before we believe it is real?
 
Top