never ever gets that far. not even close. you have to have legitimate reasons with proof cheating of any sort was done. and your side has none. zip, zero, zilch.Good chance They run back Wisconson ,and possibly Georgia because of fraud, Lets see what Amy Barrett says
never ever gets that far. not even close. you have to have legitimate reasons with proof cheating of any sort was done. and your side has none. zip, zero, zilch.
"I heards" don't count in a court of law. but keep trying.
And Robert Barnes is the one spreading the bs rumors!
big tub of goo
Minds much sharper than mine will have a lot of input into this before it's over.
Well that narrows it down to just about everyone currently breathing.
Then it should be easy for someone like yourself to link us to any of this corruption. Take your time. Otherwise, it's all people in Trumps camp, spreading false rumors again, and people like you falling for it and doing exactly as they want you to do because you're too nieve to think otherwise for yourself. Take your time. Need a legit source.Actually in some precincts they've already found more votes than there are registered voters.
Now that alone doesn't mean the fraud was perpetuated by the left or right, who knows, maybe both, but there is certainly obvious signs of frauds being committed.
That kind of stuff goes well beyond an "I heard".
Do I think Trump can overturn the election if he loses? No, probably not. But you'd be naive to think this guy is just going to go quietly into the night.....
Minds much sharper than mine will have a lot of input into this before it's over.
Then it should be easy for someone like yourself to link us to any of this corruption. Take your time. Otherwise, it's all people in Trumps camp, spreading false rumors again, and people like you falling for it and doing exactly as they want you to do because you're too nieve to think otherwise for yourself. Take your time. Need a legit source.
Nieve? WTF does that mean?
I don't watch political networks, watched them until late in the morning on election day, about 10 minutes total ever since.
On the regular daily news people that do this for a living said there is already enough probable cause to litigate. Plenty of it.
I repeated what they said. Do I know any of it as fact, of course not, no more than you know if it's not true.
And the part you don't understand is that if your side somehow loses these counts, they too will find grounds to litigate.
And suddenly there will be plenty of proof for you.
Anyway, no need to respond. I know Trump has destroyed your life and you can't speak like an adult on any of this stuff.....
You are ATE UP.
Life's too short to waste on these kind of idiots.
Tell you what, I need a bushay box or a Twinkie, I'll wave you over. If not just keep trucking along....... thanks.
We move on.
Actually legitimate news outlets are correctly pointing out that trumps legal teams litigation efforts are baseless with no leg to stand on.
The outlets like CNN and MSNBC are stating that trumps team has a legitimate and legal right to request a recount in Wisconsin where the result was less than a 1% difference. Doing so will be a waste of time however because it's a difference of 20,000 votes and they'll be lucky to find more than a 100-200 vote discrepancy
Actually legitimate news outlets are correctly pointing out that trumps legal teams litigation efforts are baseless with no leg to stand on.
Just googled it, said there was over 3,200,000 votes cast in Wisconsin. How can you say only 100 or 200 would have a discrepancy?
These kind of things (and every Bushay response) is why "normal" posters quit arguing this stuff long ago.
It's absolutely pointless to try and have a normal give and take discussion.
I like you Heis but these posts sound more like Winky or Bushay than they do you.......
So the news outlets have the evidence Trumps team will use in their possession? They already are aware of the litigation efforts of all those attorneys?
Hours after the election, Trumps evidence is already completed? And after it was done, it's apparently been sent to news outlets to be reviewed?
Wow, that would be a first!! And from there these people have the experience to make a ruling, LOL.
And lastly you are able to verify that these "legitimate news outlets" with all this information reviewed it correctly?? Have you seen the material as well?
Incredible the lengths we go to believe the story we want to believe.
Me? Again, I have no idea, not going to pretend otherwise but I can see bullshit when I read it.
I have no issue with a recount in WI. It's within the legal guidelines for trump to request that
We will see how much the vote changes.
If GA and PA flip and AZ and NV hold it won't make any difference to the outcome however
The news outlets are aware of what the trump team like Rudy G have already publicly presented for their arguments, yes
The arguments presented so far are laughable and baseless without merit
Ok, that's an entirely different statement. Sure, anyone can opine on what has been publicly said.....
In the first 48 a lot of that superficial stuff is going to be thrown around angrily. Lot of emotion involved.
No one is privy to the final arguments the Trump team will end up presenting in court, no one. Not even Donald at this point.
Carry on.
Again Heis, and I'm just curious, can you comment as to whether or not there has been any fraud or rule breaking in this election?
+500 very live right now. If no cheating
If I heard correctly a recount has NEVER overturned an election.
Traflagar group was great as was Rich Baris, but my numbers were even better
because i didnt know there would be hoodrats counting votes unchecked in Atl,Mil,Det,Philly.Then why did you bet Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Pennsylvania, and Georgia....and Trump to win the election and to win with most votes?
Did you honestly think Trump was going to get a break in Michigan after his feud with Whitmer? I even posted to you that they would go the extra mile to make sure he lost that state.because i didnt know there would be hoodrats counting votes unchecked in Atl,Mil,Det,Philly.
because i didnt know there would be hoodrats counting votes unchecked in Atl,Mil,Det,Philly.
because i didnt know there would be hoodrats counting votes unchecked in Atl,Mil,Det,Philly.
because i didnt know there would be hoodrats counting votes unchecked in Atl,Mil,Det,Philly.
Why is the left so scared of the just getting to the truth? If there are reasonable allegations of fraud they should be looked into (on both sides). I mean we all remember the hanging chads fiasco of 2000. If Biden takes over the precedency I want it to be fair and just that's all.
Why is the left so scared of the just getting to the truth? If there are reasonable allegations of fraud they should be looked into (on both sides). I mean we all remember the hanging chads fiasco of 2000. If Biden takes over the precedency I want it to be fair and just that's all.
Why is the left so scared of the just getting to the truth? If there are reasonable allegations of fraud they should be looked into (on both sides). I mean we all remember the hanging chads fiasco of 2000. If Biden takes over the precedency I want it to be fair and just that's all.
The key word being "reasonable"
They're literally still counting ballots how does anyone know what's reasonable and what's not yet?Not scared at all
So far the allegations coming from trump are baseless conspiracy theories with no factual basis to back it up
The only real election fraud based in fact so far is against the republicans in PA
They're literally still counting ballots how does anyone know what's reasonable and what's not yet?
Sorry kid I'm not a Republican and I voted for HC in 2016.Idiot try and concentrate. Think hard. Remember when Trump won in 2016. He also claimed voter fraud, to the tune of 6 million votes. He even created a voter fraud commission to investigate. It turned out to be a Trump lie. Zero fraud was found. Ane now that Trump is once again claiming voter fraud without any evidence you think it should be investigated. What a fuken Repuplicon idiot you are.