I am conflicted. I think Sandusky another fake scandal but that would give Ziegler the win. The first and only time in his life he has been on the right side. His never ending victory lap would be unbearable.
Shocking take here, a conspiracy kook thinks there's a conspiracy, LMAO
The only guy who thinks Sandusky is innocent is Ziegler, someone you admit has never been right once in his life, but you think he's right this time, LMAO, conspiracy kook's gonna conspiracy kook
For providing testimony ( or a story tale) which was exactly what the Prosecution NEEDED Mike McQueary was paid over 7 million Dollars meaning He had over 7 Million reasons to say whatever the hell they wanted him to say no matter what did or didn't happen. Was the Prosecution's motivation justice or was it to force Penn State to use it's very deep pockets and force them to make it rain in so many directions ? Penn State wound up paying over 100 Million dollars in settlements
By far Mike McQueary got the most money but there were many many others who got paid a lot of cash based on Sandusky's conviction and or based on star witness McQueary's testimony.
Without a Sandusky conviction no one gets paid anything.
People accused of awful sex crimes deserve a fair trial - especially those that were falsely accused
There are many known cases where innocent people were falsely accused of sex crimes against children.
To me The old adage " follow the money" applies here.