Adebayo in restricted area. There's a foul waiting to happen but you want the Lakers to take less than a 40% shot.
It doesn't matter. It's game situation. Give Green a million points if he hits that shot.Raiders, Danny Green isn't even in that last screenshot and I did not crop it out. He was so wide open it was silly.
Adebayo in restricted area. There's a foul waiting to happen but you want the Lakers to take less than a 40% shot.
It doesn't matter. It's game situation. Give green a million points if he hits that shot.
Yes, all game long you kick that out to Green. You can afford misses. Not with 10 seconds. I can't believe you don't understand.
I say LBJ made the best play available. Your free to disagree and you'd be wrong but you have that right.
If Green goes 2-5 on the shot, you take it all day. But he is only taking one shot, that's not the best option. Even they were down 2 or 3, I could see it but not down 1.
Math isn't for everyone. Down 1 with 10 seconds. You make the play that gives you the greatest success rate to score 1 point.
No problem here.What's your excuse?
Please advise.
Math isn't for everyone. Down 1 with 10 seconds. You make the play that gives you the greatest success rate to score 1 point.
No problem here.
Thought experiment.
What would you have said if Danny made that shot and they won the game?
You're Resulting. Becuase he missed it, it was a bad play or read or whatever you're arguing. We have a fundamental disagreement, under the circumstances, it was our best option. They had him surrounded like Custer at Little Big Horn. I understand you want LBJ to turn water into wine but my expectations are a little lower.
Miami understood the situation, Brick didn't.
Break it down. What should Green's percentage be from the top of the key, not a corner 3?Brick knew what was up.
If it worked, then great. But it wasn't the optimum play for those circumstances being down 1.
Break it down. What should Green's percentage be from the top of the key, not a corner 3?
There's no other way to put it. You're an idiot. Wide open shot during any point of the game except the last shot down 1. Down 3 I'd take a wide open 3 10' beyond the arch.I don't have his shot chart and we also have to adjust it for "wide open" 3's.
There's no other way to put it. You're an idiot. Wide open shot during any point of the game except the last shot down 1. GN
Let's say he's 35% w/ wide open top of the key shots, that's 1.05 expected points. 1.05 > 1. LBJ's a genuis and you're an idiot.
That's how you would figure it out? As I said, math isn't for everyone. Expected value is used during the game, not last shot.Let's say he's 35% w/ wide open top of the key shots, that's 1.05 expected points. 1.05 > 1. LBJ's a genuis and you're an idiot.
That's how you would figure it out? As I said, math isn't for everyone. Expected value is used during the game, not last shot.
What? How the fuck do you think they get expected points totals? They add up all the shots .
You don't add up points. It's one shot.
Agreed, One shot worth 1,05 points in our example. 1.05 > 1. Correct decision despite the poor outcome.
The math seems to be confusing you so let me explain this to you like you are a 7-year-old.
Each team is allowed 5 players on the court.
1 & 2: Corner 3's are easier to make, that's why the Heat had them both covered.
3: AD was not in position for an Alley-oop, contrary to your analysis and I would have been shocked if a Heat Defense actually gave that up.
4. LBJ was surrounded like Custer at Little Big Horn.
5. Danny Green was wide open
Hmmmmm..... who should get the shot.... let me think about this.
Now, it's really good night.
I seem to remember Jordan doing the exact same thing with Paxson and a couple years later with Kerr in NBA finals last shot situations. What's the difference minus the result?Yes, all game long you kick that out to Green. You can afford misses. Not with 10 seconds. I can't believe you don't understand.